HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| skulkey
skulkey
[4864623]
[2007-06-01 20:45:18 +0000 UTC]
"Bat Country"
(United States)
# Statistics
Favourites: 3677; Deviations: 1614; Watchers: 658
Watching: 247; Pageviews: 98216; Comments Made: 12255; Friends: 247
# Interests
Favorite visual artist: susan seddon boulet, alex grey, joan miro, enrique gran, paul laffoleyFavorite bands / musical artists: Godflesh
Favorite writers: william gibson, frank herbert, philip k. dick
Tools of the Trade: mind
Other Interests: making things
# Social Links
https://www.behance.net/skulkeyhttps://twitter.com/SkulkeyKowalski
https://www.youtube.com/user/skulkey23
# Comments
Comments: 1178
Happy birthday!
How many Earth orbits have you lived through?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That is more Earth orbits than I expected.
Me, I am roughly 761,810,367 seconds old, sad, seems like nothing.
Also, you are welcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aww, you're still a kid. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Indeed. Although, I could be lying, I could be 2,000 years old.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No probs dude, hope you had a grand day!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Happy Birthday!!! PS found your soundcloud, nice stuff!!!!! Hope the transition works well, then let us collaborate! 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thank you! 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Happy birthday Skulkey! 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am doing this early...
Happy Birthday to You... Happy Birthday to You... Don't look behind You... Happy Birthday to You...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Birthday coming up, prepare for profile page comment storm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
heh. i doubt it will be that bad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Happy upcoming Birthday, Skulkey.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Any sufficiently advanced science is indistinguishable from magic. But, any sufficiently analyzed magic is indistinguishable from science.
It can’t be supernatural.’ At least not the way you mean the term. But -for the purpose of proof by contradiction- let’s say it was. If it was, then this ‘magic’ is clearly following some underling rules. We’ve already determined a few of them experimentally. Empirical evidence and experimentation are the cornerstone of the scientific method. There is no reason this method should be any less effective at discovering the details of these rules just because what it’s analyzing is labeled ‘magic’ instead of ‘physics.’ But, if it can be analyzed using the scientific method, then it is science. Science is contradictory to how you mean to define ‘supernatural.’ Thus, it can’t be supernatural.
If--for example--ghosts could be reliably detected, then they would be 'physical' in the scientific sense. They might be intangible, but if it can be studied--if our physical brains can interact with the information provided--then they to must also be physical. Thus, I will admit my view is something of a tautology. For, I believe if something can affect the material, then it can't--by definition--be immaterial. If it can cause physical endorphins to be released in my physical brain or physical tears to appear on my physical face, then it must be physical. If I can actually be affected by it, then it must be actual.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
why is this on my profile, and what is this in response to?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It is in response to this, comments.deviantart.com/18/205…
And it is on your profile because the thread is locked do to inactivity.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
forum.deviantart.com/community… Ted Cruz believes the LGBT can't be pro-life?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
please don't leave messages about the forum on my profile. you can note me them, instead.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>