HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| DrScottHartman
DrScottHartman
♂️
[3907829]
[2007-01-05 20:44:56 +0000 UTC]
"Paleontology and Anatomy"
(United States)
# Statistics
Favourites: 202; Deviations: 175; Watchers: 3986
Watching: 39; Pageviews: 497237; Comments Made: 4781; Friends: 39
# Interests
Tools of the Trade: lots of technical papers, Intel i9, 64 gigs of ram and lots of SSDs.Other Interests: Comparative anatomy, evolution, developmental genetics, dinosaurs (duh), movies, history, psychology
# Comments
Comments: 2428
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
i was curious about your Miadanasuchus skeletal: is it intended to be a peirosaurid?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I'm aware of the basic differences such as T. prorsus' longer nasal horn, but are you familiar with the more diagnostic features that differentiate the two species of Triceratops? I don't need this for anything in particular I'm just feeding a curiosity, and as someone who isn't especially familiar with what qualifies as a diagnostic feature I think this could help me get a better understanding.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Given the growing number of genera associated with the Megaraptorans, what do you attribute to the very incomplete nature of the fossil material we currently have.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That seems to be the case with most poorly understood groups. Hopefully we can at least take care of the sampling bit in the coming years so people can at the very least decide where the heck they belong in the theropod tree.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Happy Birthday moi8! Hope you have a really great one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>