HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| Trouser-Snake
# Statistics
Favourites: 5175; Deviations: 94; Watchers: 145
Watching: 368; Pageviews: 16598; Comments Made: 3034; Friends: 368
# Comments
Comments: 932
Trouser-Snake In reply to smil235 [2012-10-04 00:52:08 +0000 UTC]
Same for you, dickface.
π: 0 β©: 1
KilxArt [2012-08-19 01:54:20 +0000 UTC]
Aw shit son.
Name change?
But I liked it when snakes were eating my babies raw. ;;
π: 0 β©: 1
Trouser-Snake In reply to KilxArt [2012-08-19 02:59:18 +0000 UTC]
lol sorry bro-
also kinda
moved accounts too-
herp-
π: 0 β©: 1
KilxArt In reply to Trouser-Snake [2012-08-19 03:26:43 +0000 UTC]
SHIT MANG.
I just can't win. :I
π: 0 β©: 0
Purilly [2012-08-18 06:28:43 +0000 UTC]
/I-I'm so late i'm sorry-/
But thank you So much for the watch > v <β₯
π: 0 β©: 0
nusonicluvr [2012-08-16 02:57:48 +0000 UTC]
Want you to know that you are amazing & you're my friend until my death. If I don't get this back, I understand. But, I have a game for you, once you read this letter, you must send it to 15 people, including the person that sent it to you . If you receive at least 3 back, you are loved. Nobody knows how important something is until...................they lose it. Tonight, right at 12:00a.m., the person you like is going to realize that they love you! Then, something is going to happen to you between 1:00 & 2:00a.m. Be ready for the greatest shock of your life. If you break this chain, you, you are going to have bad luck with love for a whole year. Send this to 15 people and see what happens β₯β₯
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to nusonicluvr [2012-08-16 03:11:13 +0000 UTC]
Erm...
these dont really work sweat heart
π: 0 β©: 0
NOKAPIplz [2012-08-15 16:40:14 +0000 UTC]
You tell people to stop tracing, yet you trace yourself.
YOU ARE NOT above the rules of this site.
π: 0 β©: 5
Broke-Bad In reply to NOKAPIplz [2012-08-16 02:51:32 +0000 UTC]
And you ARE NOT making yourself anymore Loved, funny, likeable, better, or cooler by pointing out another persons difference.
So what did you plan on gaining from this?
π: 0 β©: 3
Typhloser In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-19 12:45:31 +0000 UTC]
*Hypocrisy.
NOKAPI is pointing out hypocrisy.
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to Typhloser [2012-08-20 00:52:30 +0000 UTC]
That is a matter of opinion.
Thank you for your opinion.
π: 0 β©: 1
Typhloser In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-20 01:20:14 +0000 UTC]
Actually, that isn't opinion. They said that your friend was bitching at people who trace and whatnot, when your friend does the same. That's hypocrisy.
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to Typhloser [2012-08-20 21:06:47 +0000 UTC]
Alright.
A different approach next time then?
I realize this was wrong to you/ the others, but rudeness for rudeness and patience for patience.
Its much easier for everyone if you simply just ask for clarification, other than a different assumption.
π: 0 β©: 1
Typhloser In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-20 22:43:48 +0000 UTC]
Nah, I like being awesome the way I am
π: 0 β©: 0
GnJNetter In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-19 05:16:34 +0000 UTC]
A wild Whiteknight appears
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to GnJNetter [2012-08-19 06:56:49 +0000 UTC]
... I'm going to take this as a compliment... regardless..
lol
π: 0 β©: 1
GnJNetter In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-19 07:02:45 +0000 UTC]
I just see that you're whining because you're a base artist yourself.
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to GnJNetter [2012-08-20 00:51:16 +0000 UTC]
I'm sorry but my whining would involve, "WTF" and other nonsence. I'm simply giving out my opinion.
π: 0 β©: 1
GnJNetter In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-20 00:54:18 +0000 UTC]
Not really.
So do you think that she is above the rules of copyright?
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to GnJNetter [2012-08-20 01:01:54 +0000 UTC]
Yes because you know me so well, maybe better than I know myself.
I don't think anyone is above the rules of copyright. But I knew/know this person. I know that she wouldnβt have done it out of jealousy, or spite. Just to make a base.
Which most base-makers are like. If the owner asks, The image will be taken down. if the owner approves, then nothing is tampered with. But when someone who is NOT the owner of the original comes, and bitches, or nags about it, then I think that that is just annoying. So I reply with the same response.
π: 0 β©: 1
GnJNetter In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-20 01:05:14 +0000 UTC]
I only know you as much as what you put out there.
The original artist shouldn't have to come defend their work, and frankly, they're to busy to anyways, so don't you think that it's fair that no one should take their work?
And the original argument was about how the artist commented on how people should be original and do their own work, yet she doesn't follow her own advice, thus being hypocritical.
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to GnJNetter [2012-08-20 01:13:36 +0000 UTC]
Have you ever used a base?
You should try.
Because quite simply, you can be original with one. You can either just slap on spikes and call it hair, or you can use your own style, and give the doll character. Thatβs I why I like bases.
You see different interpretations of one piece of work. Like say I see a base, and think of a girl with a beach ball. But when you see it, you think of a girl with a magical electric orb. (or what ever you may see)
So this is what I believe that she was trying to say, she might have said in a way most people would not understand, but it still goes for even using a base.
π: 0 β©: 1
GnJNetter In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-20 01:19:13 +0000 UTC]
No I haven't, because I don't see the need to. I know you can be original with one, but the point is that it's not original to begin with; it's someone else's work that was traced.
π: 0 β©: 0
NOKAPIplz In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-17 01:15:46 +0000 UTC]
What do you gain from defending art thieves?
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to NOKAPIplz [2012-08-17 04:24:38 +0000 UTC]
Have you not realized that DeviantART accepts traced bases yet?
Or is it that YOU can't accept it?
Either way though, if you dont agree with something, or you dont like it, why waste your own time to nag about it?
π: 0 β©: 1
NOKAPIplz In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-17 05:29:20 +0000 UTC]
Because nothing gets done when people shut up and don't do anything.
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to NOKAPIplz [2012-08-19 02:35:46 +0000 UTC]
Actually it does.
Its called evolution.
π: 0 β©: 2
World-Hero21 In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-19 05:38:15 +0000 UTC]
I don't think that word means what you think it means. :/
...Unless it's a typo and you meant "revolution," but I don't think that's the right word either.
π: 0 β©: 3
Broke-Bad In reply to World-Hero21 [2012-08-19 06:55:37 +0000 UTC]
Just think about it real hard. Something will come to mind, and then you might get what I'm trying to say.
π: 0 β©: 2
World-Hero21 In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-19 17:23:50 +0000 UTC]
So you do mean "evolution"?
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to World-Hero21 [2012-08-20 00:48:08 +0000 UTC]
I'm sorry are you asking a legitimate question, or just trying to disagree? Either way its very amusing.
Anyways yes, I meant evolution, you know, when monkeys magically became humans. No one nagged it into happening.
π: 0 β©: 3
Cruel-Quillish In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-20 04:14:54 +0000 UTC]
Monkeys didn't become humans. There's speculation that monkeys and humans share an ancestor somewhere down the line because of our similar traits, but we never evolved from monkeys. I seriously think you need to go back to school, seeing as this is basic knowledge.
Actually, evolution takes quite a bit of effort. If homo sapiens were to not create art and languages, we would have easily been wiped out by all the other forms of human creatures that were alive at the time. The only reason homo sapiens survived is because we fought the hardest. And we continued to evolve from that point onto what we are today because we made an effort to change our society.
π: 0 β©: 0
World-Hero21 In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-20 01:33:43 +0000 UTC]
No, I'm asking a legitimate question. The way you're using the word "evolution" doesn't fit with the conversation here. At least it doesn't fit well enough to be clear to me.
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to World-Hero21 [2012-08-20 21:09:08 +0000 UTC]
I don't know how I can explain this any further without starting an argument about evolution, which I seem to already have accomplished.
Yes, I meant it.
Itβs a term I and most everyone I know use as well.
π: 0 β©: 1
World-Hero21 In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-20 21:50:08 +0000 UTC]
But how does it fit in with the topic? :/ That's all I want to know.
π: 0 β©: 0
obligatorydigger In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-20 01:31:04 +0000 UTC]
No one ever said monkeys evolved into humans, you fucking pleb.
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to obligatorydigger [2012-08-20 20:58:25 +0000 UTC]
[link]
Charles Darwin's theory on evolution.
I'm not arguing on this any further. I don't find meaning in it.
π: 0 β©: 2
obligatorydigger In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-21 04:31:12 +0000 UTC]
You're also not arguing any further because someone replied with basically the same thing I did, a day earlier than I did. You really are pathetic. Running after trying to get the final word in, you are such a massive pussy.
π: 0 β©: 0
obligatorydigger In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-21 04:26:40 +0000 UTC]
Pulling a wikipedia article, how nice.
Charles Darwin actually stated that after his observations, he hypothesized that animals of similar species shared a common sncestor, which we share with monkeys. It's impossible for us to have evolved from something that exists, as natural selection would kill them off if they did not evolve, thus becoming defects in an ever-changing environment. Learn more about Evolution instead of skimming a Wikipedia article based off an assumption.
π: 0 β©: 0
projectsonic In reply to Broke-Bad [2012-08-19 13:53:00 +0000 UTC]
I'm pretty sure that I can get what you thought you meant. And guess what? Still wrong word.
π: 0 β©: 1
Broke-Bad In reply to projectsonic [2012-08-20 00:48:38 +0000 UTC]
Alrighty sweat-heart.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>