Liv-free In reply to SeprenMaelstrom [2012-03-20 17:19:07 +0000 UTC]

Thank goodness this wasn't someone who really thought she was putting art up here. I almost fainted

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cartoonartist9 In reply to Liv-free [2012-08-13 13:57:17 +0000 UTC]

It was sort of art... the art of god. LOL!

Nah she was putting porn up here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Liv-free In reply to Cartoonartist9 [2012-10-11 01:34:14 +0000 UTC]

Clearly lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

anime133 In reply to A-zne [2011-11-17 19:38:21 +0000 UTC]

There is a big different between porn and nude art...go do some research

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Adkit In reply to anime133 [2011-11-25 15:32:36 +0000 UTC]

Lol at teh fact that you're saying that nonsense on a profile from a man impersonating a softcore porn star using her softcore porn pictures. It's not "art".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

anime133 In reply to Adkit [2011-11-26 01:32:58 +0000 UTC]

It depends on what you perceive as art really, the naked body in general is art in any shape or form, it is only the act that forms the distinction between. You can lol all you want coz in the end your interests are being controlled by the media, dont think drawings and origami are the only things that define art

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Adkit In reply to anime133 [2011-11-27 13:45:29 +0000 UTC]

No, art is in the eye of the beholder, anything can be considered "artful" if the person looking at it thinks it's art. My dad once told me about how he and his friends snuck in to an outdoors art show while it was closed for the night and put a bunch of trash in a pile instead of one of the exhibits. Needless to say it was critically acclaimed. Does that mean it WAS art? No. It means that the word "art" is pretentious and useless and nobody should ever describe anything as "art" just because they fancy it.

The same goes for nude pictures. If you look at it and think it's beautiful that doesn't make it art. It doesn't make it porn either. So then the word "art" and "porn" loses all meaning and all that matters is what the person who TOOK the photo intended it as. If the photographer was taking a photo of a naked woman and wanted people to masturbate to it, like here, guess what? It's not art!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

A-zne In reply to anime133 [2011-11-22 13:21:32 +0000 UTC]

naw man im good. and im entitled to my own opinion thanks :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

anime133 In reply to A-zne [2011-11-23 20:21:36 +0000 UTC]

That is not an opinion...thats a complaint...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

A-zne In reply to anime133 [2011-11-24 02:04:43 +0000 UTC]

and you complaining to me isn't bettering yourself o:
and it wont change what i think, sorry.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

anime133 In reply to A-zne [2011-11-26 01:37:40 +0000 UTC]

I was not complaining, i was informing you that you are both wrong and uneducated. Not all nude images are porn, you are only young though, so i figure

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

A-zne In reply to anime133 [2011-11-28 17:05:12 +0000 UTC]

what ever tickles yo butt man o:
i really don't care :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NativeMaid In reply to JurassicParkGeek [2010-05-19 20:41:19 +0000 UTC]

dude, seriously... if you don't like it, why view it? art has many different facets and you're coming across as jealous, honey. that's not very attractive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

nokari In reply to NativeMaid [2010-05-26 23:17:05 +0000 UTC]

Seriously? This isn't artistic, it's just a webcam picture show of a chick showing off her body for pervs to jack off to. There's hundreds of thousands of websites out there this stuff is better suited for. No one is jealous of her, except maybe you.

If you want to oogle at her tits all day, tell her to take them where they belong instead of bringing smut into a place where children visit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NativeMaid In reply to nokari [2010-05-27 05:37:02 +0000 UTC]

dude, seriously. all i saw was like two images. and they were covered up!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nokari In reply to NativeMaid [2010-05-27 05:38:56 +0000 UTC]

How's this then? [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NativeMaid In reply to nokari [2010-05-27 05:44:18 +0000 UTC]

And? So what. She's COVERED UP in all those!! Not one nip showing. At least she's not flashing her lady bits!

And there ARE lots of people who post photos of nothing BUT lady bits!! On a site where children visit! But they put blocks on those images so children DON'T see them.

I'm not jealous, I think she's gorgeous. And anyway, her account has been closed. So what's the point? Really..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nokari In reply to NativeMaid [2010-05-27 05:53:43 +0000 UTC]

You must have the mature filter on or you're under 18 cause there isn't just 2 clothed images in that gallery.

This is the girl you're talking about and half of what you see there is in that gallery.

On a site where children visit! But they put blocks on those images so children DON'T see them.

1) That doesn't excuse porn, not that I'm saying the particular images in her gallery are, and 2) that still doesn't change the fact that this is an ART website, not a website for putting up webcam pictures of girl's tits just to get attention.

And anyway, her account has been closed.

No it hasn't. They just put up "account closed". If it were closed, then there would be a ! next to the username and you couldn't even see this page.

OH, and the person who created this account isn't even a girl. It's some dude posing as a porn model named Southern Brooke.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NativeMaid In reply to nokari [2010-05-27 05:59:34 +0000 UTC]

Well, thank you for the information. I am 25 years old, not that it's any of your business.

I applaud your fervor for art.

Have a pleasant day.

Cheers.
X

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JurassicParkGeek In reply to NativeMaid [2010-05-19 21:30:57 +0000 UTC]

no im not jealous i just don't like ppl doing that to themselves like that. I have many friends that do it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Check-Yes-Meigara In reply to FelishaLisha [2011-04-12 04:49:15 +0000 UTC]

I agree completely. *Military salute*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1