Comments: 14
jraypatten [2014-10-23 15:50:29 +0000 UTC]
The dropper method is good. I had a setup that used an IV bag to provide the drops. I need to see if I can get one again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jraypatten In reply to 30-AMP [2014-10-24 01:13:28 +0000 UTC]
That's fine. I remember seeing it on a photography forum some time back when I was trying to do drops for the first time, I'd credit it, but I truly don't remember where I got it from originally.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
K-T-Elite [2014-10-19 22:33:14 +0000 UTC]
This is so so beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zozimas [2014-10-19 18:59:50 +0000 UTC]
Love this one, may I ask how?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
30-AMP In reply to Zozimas [2014-10-20 22:42:48 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome. The eye dropper method is good for individual drops, that's what I started doing. You can do drops with one flash. I had a similar setup where the wood was above the pan and I had drilled a hole through it that the glass bit of the dropper could fit through so you placed it back in the exact same spot each time. Had the cam on tripod obviously and had set the focus (manually) Then I have a really slow shutter speed (like 3 secs - in a fairly dark room) and I have a flash that I trigger manually. I fill the dropper up with water and place it in the holder. Push the shutter on the camera, squeeze the dropper and then manually fire the flash which is what is capturing the image.
Good thing doing it that way is you can hold the flash in any position and get it really close to the droplet. Once you have the pan of water and whatever bodged together frame to hold the dropper in place you can take a long series of shots of; fill the dropper, place the dropper, push the shutter, squeeze the dropper, fire the flash: fill the dropper, place the dropper, push the shutter, squeeze the dropper, fire the flash...etc etc
👍: 0 ⏩: 0