HOME | DD
4-X-S โ Unmanned tank type2 drawing
by-nd
Published: 2010-04-05 03:00:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 7987; Favourites: 89; Downloads: 353
Redirect to original
Description
...Related content
Comments: 59
This isn't sexy please don;t have funny ideas XD
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
hahahahaha, now that you mention it
haha, no, i just really love technical drawings
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Look back now, this got be one of the worst design I made
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
yeah, this might be one of the worst designs you ever made, but its still awesome and thousand times better than most.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
better than most highschool deisgn, yes I guess.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
well, dont be like this
its better than my pics, and im some decades past highschool
....
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
If I made this now, I would not bother to get this transform robot bull shit, and would just be a straight forward tank straight forward plane. The construction too boxy, now days I would use surface transition instead of box on top of box. In any mech I would not add useless geometries, it should be somewhat smooth.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
i see your points, and quite honestly, im making those same mistakes.
but on the other hand, i love raw industrial design, so i can also appreciate box on top of box design stuph.
you have to be really really , like really, good to achieve realistic impression with stylish curvy design.
im not that good..
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
I know that things standout with edges, but structural integrity is a settle quality that you can only notice if you take a second look on things. Two factors support minimal and curve transition is first you realize things can go wrong when edged construct bump into something, cause both hazard to the victim and itself. Even with immortal god emperor it still collect dirt and shit, That's what we mean structural integrity, the other is how far you can zoom out and still recognizable, a super detailed design may look like a random mess from far away. This means when things have to take a tiny space on the canvas, some information can be safely ignored and the proxy still carry an identity. This means all the detail feature have to be peripheral and not part of the construct.
The difficulty with drawing a curvy design is the limitation of line art, you cannot fully express the gradual transition of a geometry with a binary quality to turn or not to turn. You will need some degree of shading to see what its like, and formation with lighting is often the skill to be handled after the mastery of drawing with lines. What mostly being used as a bridge between the two technique is pylon approximation, this is a very popular technique in mech illustration. It both communicate the wholeness of a curvy construct, it also introduce edges that bring attention.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
fantastic work, it look awesome! love the design!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
ๆๆฐดๅนณๅฆ๏ผไฝๅ้ฝๅพ็ๅ๏ผ็ฅ้ฉฌ่ฝฏไปถๆ็ๅฆใ
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
ไธๆฏ่ฝฏไปถ, ๆ็ป็. ๅ ถๅฎๆฐดๅนณไธ่ฌ.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
thanks, I think I saw you before, thanks anyway.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
This is pretty cuddly, have to squeeze a bit harder so it knows its loved.
Looks great.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Oh thanks, I think its kind awful, but glad you like it.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Ha, I wish I could make such "Awful" stuff.
Try not to diss your own work because its not a good thing for your mind.
Maybe its not your best but you will do better and no one makes the good stuff out of nowhere.
Without the awful stuff you will not get to the better/good/great stuff.
Keep your "failures" too, nothing like looking back when it seems that you are not going anywhere.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Thanks for appreciate my progress, I don't think its really "diss", its just a motivation to improve I guess. It wasn't that "awful" back then but I now know better than when I made that thing. I have never studied art professionally, its just an entertainment to be "productive".
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Keep banging away then and enjoy the view.
Just for laughs, "Unmanned" can also mean "Gelded" or "Castrated".
Probably only a concern if you have Robots/Mechs that get frisky.
A recently unmanned mech might need that extra support of a hug.
Playing with words can be fun.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Errr, word games are fine, but my intention with this "unmanned" thing has something to do with Engineering. Its easier to design a unmanned machine that the one with pilot that the one with passengers that the one with tourists... It can be made into wild shape without worry about "life support".
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Put a camera on it and the tourists can watch safely at home.
I will be watching, Um, not in a stalker sense for more stuff from you.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Thanks for watching, stalker or not
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
I LOVE IT! If you like, come over and comment on my Mechas.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Your handwriting is neat... okay on-topic, this thing... how much weight do you think it can support?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
support about 1.5 times of itself I guess, and its kind useless vechile wirth cool waking legs.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
thanks I will do better.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
my name is "yang" I have my name on some of my works I don't remember which one.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
I guess just send me a note if you want to keep it secret, what kind space fighter and when do you want it?
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
fantastic vehicle very detailed
and excellent design
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Suddenly an AT-ST seems cute and cuddly next to this thing.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Suddenly an AT-AT seems like AT&T next to this thing.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
So slow and miserable.
Did you know the U.S. Army has had walker technology since 1960?
The AT-AT of Star Wars was actually inspired from the Walking Truck...walker designed for the jungles of Vietnam.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
| Next =>