HOME | DD

7markus7 — Red shadow

Published: 2015-03-14 11:33:17 +0000 UTC; Views: 611; Favourites: 27; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description Red shadow sz 92 x 76 cm , 2015 , acrylics - ( 2 x 46 x 38 cm papers ) .
Related content
Comments: 15

Fishbonik [2016-09-30 19:56:09 +0000 UTC]

Really, really like you style

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

7markus7 In reply to Fishbonik [2016-10-02 11:15:15 +0000 UTC]

thank you , alive and abstract , i´d say

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

vinny53 [2015-03-27 16:23:53 +0000 UTC]

I like the fresh feel of this painting, well done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

7markus7 In reply to vinny53 [2015-03-27 22:04:05 +0000 UTC]

Thank you , i did this in one evening and it´s quite large .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Glenyss [2015-03-23 13:49:26 +0000 UTC]

Well done!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

7markus7 In reply to Glenyss [2015-03-23 14:20:30 +0000 UTC]

Lots of thanks !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pstros [2015-03-15 21:33:59 +0000 UTC]

very cold

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

7markus7 In reply to pstros [2015-03-15 22:09:59 +0000 UTC]

yep , red shadow makes everything else look cold in the picture .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ClairObscur16 [2015-03-14 13:54:45 +0000 UTC]

 Red shadow, I understand. Why is the face so stylized, quite inhuman, at least asexual?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Glenyss In reply to ClairObscur16 [2015-03-23 13:52:00 +0000 UTC]

I like that the face isn't too detailed. It's the body in this that is so interesting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

7markus7 In reply to ClairObscur16 [2015-03-14 14:32:49 +0000 UTC]

model is from last night´s hot date with Playboy summertime special 1988 , i don´t see any sense in making unknown face detailed , it´s not interesting .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ClairObscur16 In reply to 7markus7 [2015-03-14 16:55:24 +0000 UTC]

An unknown (anonym?) face hasn't to be "detailed"? OK. If you say so.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

7markus7 In reply to ClairObscur16 [2015-03-14 17:07:18 +0000 UTC]

yep , unless there´s reason for it to be detailed ... here´s no such reason i liked to display movement , rtyhm , color and composition ,
not an unknown face .
 Do you see movement in her face , like she was turning her head and face appeared in two places at once ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ClairObscur16 In reply to 7markus7 [2015-03-14 18:24:50 +0000 UTC]

 I understand what you mean. You are just interested by this ambivalence? The only interest of the human body is giving rythm and color to your "composition"?  any woman (or man)  as object? ( May I speak french?? I'm tired with this english I don't master!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

7markus7 In reply to ClairObscur16 [2015-03-14 19:15:59 +0000 UTC]

it´s not human body , it´s a painting .
i have better detailed wiew to human body in Playboy .
paintings ARE color and composition and brushstrokes , not human bodies .
... and it´s a question of taste if detailed wiew or blurry picture with motion is more appealing .
.... and even this blurry picture does have details , they´re details of brushstrokes themselves , not so much details of
human body , i mean ´ not so much details of illusion of human body ´

👍: 0 ⏩: 0