Comments: 9
999inthedark [2012-05-29 08:10:18 +0000 UTC]
oh, oops, forgot to finish the next point.
so, with that all in mind, it is a great thing when a person can view life from each angle. First Person, Third Person, and Eagle-Eye view. staying in any one of them too long has the potential to stunt a person in some way. A balance is a good thing to have, in seeing your life for your person. First Person. seeing life from the point of view of others, Third Person. and from taking a step back to look at things of what you can see on the full picture, Eagle-Eye.
which then leaves the x-ray goggles vision, which deals with seeing truth, and truth comes from God, and the closer your relationship to Him, the more truth you will see.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Partial-Credit In reply to 999inthedark [2012-06-07 01:41:00 +0000 UTC]
Are you an LoZ fan? Ah, if only there was a Lens of Truth irl!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
999inthedark In reply to Partial-Credit [2012-06-07 17:31:11 +0000 UTC]
haha, yea, I like Legend of Zelda. and, Lens of Truth or Mask of Truth might be nice. though, I suppose we sort of have that, sort of. the Bible, or our spirit when it is connected to God.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Partial-Credit In reply to 999inthedark [2012-06-07 19:19:07 +0000 UTC]
In a way, yes. A physical tool that works instantly would certainly be easier, but I suppose that was never meant to be, lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
999inthedark In reply to Partial-Credit [2012-06-07 20:49:51 +0000 UTC]
haha, yea, maybe. who knows, maybe there will be a way some time in some way. anything could be possible. our knowledge about the universe and all that God has put into it is still far from complete.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Partial-Credit [2012-05-29 04:50:10 +0000 UTC]
I think this is a great analogy of life. God is very much the programmer of life (not to say that all of creation is as autonomous as our computer programming).
In some games the programmers program themselves in, such as in Pokemon or a couple FF games (I think), so even if you meet them in game, you cannot experience the actual person in-person. To extrapolate your scenario (and I don't know if you believe in the Holy Trinity), God the Father put Himself in-game with us in the person of His Son, Jesus. Our characters, ourselves, can have in-game experiences and an in-game relationship with God this way, but cannot experience the fullness of His glory or meet the Father face-to-face until the epilogue - the afterlife.
The three ways of looking at gaming which you described here are probably the least shallow ways. Unfortunately, even the Eagle-Eyers are guilty of floundering in the shallows now and then. But I consider every moment Eagle-Eying a gift.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
999inthedark In reply to Partial-Credit [2012-05-29 08:07:15 +0000 UTC]
hmmm, didn't think about that aspect. that is a very very good point on the Trinity aspect.
also, another great point for even those who take a step back and look at a bigger picture, the Eagle-Eyers. it can be easy to get fixed to look at one part of a picture from above for so long, that you don't move around to the other aspects, first person and 3rd person can be very important. seeing as it is your life, first person, you have choices to make, and only staying back in life only, to observe only, well... life is short, might as well do something with it.
yes, there is a time to observe, but there is also a time for action. it is possible to do both at the same time, but it can be easy to fall into one area at a time. either staying back to observe, or to step in and take action.
3rd person view is good as well, if you find yourself falling off course, and taking actions that, are not pleasant, though you may not realize it when taking those actions, you notice later on when you look back at what you did, and how it effected others.
sadly, some people stay in first person, all for themselves.
some people stay in 3rd person, letting others control them, letting EXPECTATIONS grab hold of their lives, as if expectation is the most important thing.
and then others stay in the eagle-eye view, they observe their hole lives, but, in the end, they never really did anything with their lives. they never imparted their observations to anyone else.
as it is important for a person to share the Gospel, Jesus came down for the purpose of saving those who did not believe. He came down to save sinners. Our lives, being called to be Like Christ, as is what being a Christian is, to be Like Christ, we have that time needed for learning and growing, but then there is the time when we start using what we have learned and experienced, to share to others. as Our Testimony. yes, we can continue to learn and grow while walking, but, think of it like this:
the time you need, to step back and learn and grow and observe, is like when you are a baby. you can't do much right now. if you try too soon, you'll fall over again. but, after several tries, and after you have observed enough, you'll get it. of course, as you start to walk, you will still stumble at times, as we are human, we make mistakes, but, we have God there to pick us up again, as a parent would in teaching their child to walk. staying in the sidelines, but, when you fall, always there to catch you. even if sometimes it doesn't seem like it.
and then, once you do get started walking, you continue to grow and learn, while you are getting out there doing something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Partial-Credit In reply to 999inthedark [2012-06-07 01:40:01 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps I haven't reached that turning point myself, but it seems difficult to determine when that point is between only learning and then learning/acting. Video games are based on the player being able to act, so the acting begins at the outset, and the characters and player learn more of the plot as they go along reacting to their situation. I suppose in that regard, life is a little different. I suppose, also, the difference stems from the difference in missions: in video games, the object is always to defeat a certain foe/save the world, whereas real life involves helping save peoples' souls, an arguably more arduous task.
I often prefer an eagle-eye view of things when I'm gaming. I wonder if that means anything? How about you, what view do you prefer when gaming?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
999inthedark In reply to Partial-Credit [2012-06-07 17:43:07 +0000 UTC]
first, the point between learning and doing, is the time for your learning, to when God calls you to "start your ministry", your ministry basically being your life for Him. His light can shine through you, even as you live each day of your life, with out necessarily even telling someone about Him, people can tell there is something about you when you are following Him.
second, video games generally start off with some type of story, or cutscene or prologue in some way to have a bit of a back story to what is going on, to give your adventure a bit of meaning. that point, is like your life in the time of learning and being prepared for what God has for you.
thirdly, though video games focus on "stopping a foe" or "saving the world", in a sense, your life would be doing that when living for God. God showing His light through you, as you live for Him, and you able to show His love to them, to bring them to Him, both stops the enemy, to a point, from having such a hold on their life with so many lies. yes, more lies will come, but, for that moment, their world is saved. until the next disaster. some games will go ahead and show an epiologue of some sort. to show that life continues past the "saving point". just as your life goes on after accepting Him. and the world has potential to come along more difficulties. though perhaps not quite as "big" per se, but, still little "white lies" here and there, that could stray the person off course. to go back to their life of complacency and such.
as for view I like most, honestly, it depends on the game. I don't really like first person much. eagle eye is alright at times, but, I think, for playing games, 3rd person might be my favorite. 2nd would be Eagle-Eye. and 3rd would be 1st person.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0