Comments: 10
redwolfradolf [2012-11-02 04:57:31 +0000 UTC]
That is really hot.
But how do you get away with calling one Paudron plate armor?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
a-bad-idea In reply to redwolfradolf [2012-11-02 06:08:55 +0000 UTC]
Because an AC bonus is just a number =X
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
redwolfradolf In reply to a-bad-idea [2012-11-02 17:38:53 +0000 UTC]
If I was DM, you wouldn't have gotten away with it, but whatevs.
I'm also a huge stickler for practicality when it comes to armor and weapons, so I'm bound to critisize at some point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
a-bad-idea In reply to redwolfradolf [2012-11-02 18:44:01 +0000 UTC]
None of us at our table were really fans of letting the books tell us what we looked like. We all had different ideas of what we thought was cool (some people liked dark gritty fantasy, some people liked colorful wacky fantasy, some people liked fairy tale fantasy), so practically everything was accepted, at least as long as the concept was still communicated somewhat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
redwolfradolf In reply to a-bad-idea [2012-11-03 06:10:24 +0000 UTC]
It's nt to say that I'd stick to the books description, but in our table it usually has to be within acceptable bounds.
For example, I tried hard for a scythe, but I couldn't find any beleivable thing to label it as.
What I did get was a khopesh, which the DM let me call a bastard sword.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
a-bad-idea In reply to redwolfradolf [2012-11-03 07:36:23 +0000 UTC]
But... there's a scythe in the book =O It's a 2d4 two-handed high crit weapon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
redwolfradolf In reply to a-bad-idea [2012-11-04 02:28:42 +0000 UTC]
That just ain't gonna cut it for my Longtooth Shifter ex-gladiator.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Axis-Sunsoar [2012-02-17 02:31:15 +0000 UTC]
One small pauldron gives her higher mobility, equating to easier defense from dodging. AC isn't exclusively smash resistance...^.^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0