Comments: 11
ansh3lm In reply to aautio [2007-04-09 08:31:27 +0000 UTC]
where? I have tried to look for a clear or as clear as possible explanation about the appearance of elves. I have always seen elves as to be more than men, like men but still more beautiful, handsome, (now some finnish, because of my lack of skill in english, I assume you are finnish )siis ajattelin, että haltiat olisi siis jotenkin olemukseltaan vahvempia, parempia, kauniimpia, komeampia, siis jotain sellaista mitä on vaikea selittää suoraan, mutta mikä "vain" näkyy. Fair Folk?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aautio In reply to ansh3lm [2007-04-09 15:57:47 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I agree with you: I don't think Quendi were physically much different from Atani, jut somehow more beautiful, more "perfect" in a way.. I believe the main difference was in their "soul", fëa, and not their bodies. You can find in HoME (probably in the Athrabeth, IIRC) the notion that they were virtually just two branches of the same race, since they could produce fertile offspring.
To answer your question: I think that in the Etymologies of Elvish (published in HoME 5) he wrote a note in the description of the stem *LAS (usually meaning "leaf") that elven ears were leaf-shaped and more pointed than human ones (although the validity of this notion has been questioned). Supporting this would also be the fact that during his lifetime Tolkien approved of the artwork done for his books featuring pointy-eared elves without a word. I don't see any reason to really overdo that little difference, though.
Also, I think there's been almost as much debate over this issue as the infamous "Do Balrogs have wings?" (Well, of course they do, but let's not get started on this one, ok.. )
(ja kyllä joo, olen suomalainen. Vastaan nyt vaan ulkomaan kielellä, jos jotain muutakin sattuu aihe kiinnostamaan..)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1