HOME | DD
acelanceloet β CVX-concept 3C
Published: 2011-01-15 11:41:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 6917; Favourites: 38; Downloads: 208
Redirect to original
Description
I choose to draw this ship because there are so many misinterpretations of it on the web. size, capabilities and design are sometimes randomly drawn, or wrong parts are added or important ones removed.the best example for an wrong one is this:
[link]
I hope this drawing of mine can now show for good what the CVX would have looked if this design was chosen. I can have mistakes, because there is never build an single ship that comes close to this one. but on most points this is how it would have looked.
please comment.
Related content
Comments: 39
that's what I thought too 
π: 0 β©: 0
Mind if I use this as my CVN80 with a few plane mods?
π: 0 β©: 1
that's fine 
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes I was think I could make it either wide or increase it's hieght
π: 0 β©: 1
no you couldn't. these drawbacks are just the problems of an stealth carrier design. and those were while it hasn't been build (the ford is build instead)
π: 0 β©: 1
Well I guess I'll find the ford
π: 0 β©: 0
thanks 
π: 0 β©: 1
You stupid fucker I said his ship was well done lay off the weed
π: 0 β©: 1
??? I can't understand what you are trying to say?
π: 0 β©: 1
I was not complament you
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't know the word 'complament' exists in the english language, nor can I find any proof of it. so what are you trying to say?
π: 0 β©: 1
Complement asshole complement
π: 0 β©: 1
still I do not understand, but I think I don't want to..... just leave this and all my other work.
π: 0 β©: 1
I never got one compliment from you on my scratch builts with no resources just many trolls you don't think I was harrased there? thats just wrong
π: 0 β©: 1
no compliment? first of all, because you were new. there were mistakes on your ship, I helped you fix those. that was my goal, not to say 'you are very bad and that and that is wrong' but to say 'if you improve that and that and that, this could get great!'
second, look at the work some members make. for example ALVAMA or bezobrazov. you really think your work was worth an compliment already? not now, maybe later, but well...... that's out of the question now.
π: 0 β©: 1
really what happened to my week ban you just majically changed it to permanant
π: 0 β©: 1
gollevainen changed it. look here
[link]
I am not an admin, I cannot ban you forever. but after I showed them how you put jabba's work on here, I can not do anything for you. as I say there: you've done this yourself. and please continiou this discussion by notes, as I don't want to fill my drawings with comments like these.
π: 0 β©: 1
yeah they are there but I can't remove them. do you get that? sorry but I have no choice but to keep this up until further notice. In all you poorly represented SB as it was more troll fest then anything helpful
π: 0 β©: 1
I get you can't remove them, but we'll talk about this by notes now, please.
π: 0 β©: 0
It looks like it has 3 to 4 lanuh decs with a aft launch contole tower and a frward bridge below the fligh line. But i see no defncive armerments beond what could be basic AA gun/mashineguns. But if a submerasabul battel ship or battel carrier git her in big gun range shed be in truble. not to mention steath ships, fast crusers or heavy destryers could git a jump on her with there mid size cannons on rapid fire HV guns. Thats why you should atles have a lest a single haevy cannon 45inch or up at least 3 to 5 barrles. On this ship id et it on the bow on the plat form infront and below the bridge. Or id use VLASM (veticle launch anti-ship missles) withc you can put alot of on that ship.
π: 0 β©: 1
the ship has 2 launch decks: the main deck (where the recovery is handled as well) and the secondary deck, which has catapults on the sides and an hangar in the middle.
in the design theory's when this ship was designed, the ESSM missile was the best protection against missiles and aircraft.
against subs or enemy warships she has escort ships, just like the current US aircraft carriers.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ship to ship battle rule foucs fire on the biggest ship at max range and strike out of the sunrise.
π: 0 β©: 1
that can be true (I don't think so) but this ship is based on the US design theories between 1995 and 2000...... and even then it was loosely based on cold war concepts = large battlefleets with each ship it's own role.
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh i got my design skill from navle ops warship gunner/comander. I find CV's lack fire power if you dont give them a full cannon batter to give eanmy a 35 bearriel broad side (7 mounts 5 bearriels each) naile a curser head on with that shell sink or hit her brad side to brod side and you could snap a battle ship in 2
π: 0 β©: 1
design skill is something different from warship gunner/commander
π: 0 β©: 1
Still it teach's the baisics of the balice Firepower, speed and armor. But I tend to be light to mid on armor but have ships doing 50+ nouts and CV's BC's and BB donig 35 to 40 nouts. And most ships have the firepower to hit well above there wight class. Ie i have destroyers go one on one with battleships and cut them don in 5 to 6 broad sides (mostly 6.5" oxsegen torpidose or 7" homing torpidos)
π: 0 β©: 1
just remember that all you now describe is impossible in real life.... it's just an game
π: 0 β©: 1
not true ww2 tafy 3 a destroer group took on a pushed back the yamoto and her escort fleet of battleships and heavy crusers. tafy 3 was made up of i think 4 light destroers anf 3 pockit carriers and the destores sunk 2 battleships and wounded the superbattleship yamoto.
π: 0 β©: 1
yes, but they won't get to 50 knots. the max speed of an ww2 mtb was 40 knots, an destroyer could reach 40 as well, but an cruiser or battleship never got higher then 25 or so.
π: 0 β©: 1
My speed was do to light armor plating was week as hell on my ships to git the speed i used power and manver. so even light guns could do real damage to my ships. so its tread off insted of strong armor i use high speeds to avoid enamy fire and hit them as hard as i can, then run away befor they can retalyate CV and BC are a paine with there planes but high angle guns and mg nests chew them up farely well as long as i dont stand still they dont hit me.
π: 0 β©: 1
yes, but in reality that also won't work. believe me, that game is far away from reality (as is almost every game, except the real sims, and even those aren't that close)
π: 0 β©: 1
well yeah but still the concept works in practis and in rale life id have to put less guns on it but id steel have the poer to sink a supper carrier in one salvoe
π: 0 β©: 0
You're welcome Admiral!
π: 0 β©: 0
Perhaps I'm a little naΓ―ve, but there are no bow thrusters on a ship of this length? Quite impressive in scale, nevertheless.
π: 0 β©: 1
the henry ford won't have them (the new US CVN program) and the hull is an slightly shortened version of that ship. it would be an good idea indeed, but the US navy seems to rely on tugs instead
π: 0 β©: 0