Comments: 14
bomsteinam [2017-07-12 00:14:07 +0000 UTC]
Was she hit????????
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FBOMBheart [2011-05-16 23:02:47 +0000 UTC]
NICE close up!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adam-Schoenwald In reply to FBOMBheart [2011-05-17 00:32:11 +0000 UTC]
Thanks man I like it too, it is really nice, and to think that this ship is huge and the saucer section is covering up the rest!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FBOMBheart In reply to Adam-Schoenwald [2011-05-17 14:55:13 +0000 UTC]
I didn't realize until watching TOS that Galaxy Class wasn't the only ship that could detach the saucer section.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adam-Schoenwald In reply to FBOMBheart [2011-05-17 16:00:26 +0000 UTC]
Yeah it's crazy I don't think I knew about it until I watched the saucer section separate in TNG, then read about it somewhere that TOS could separate, but would require a space station to "put back together". I don't know if it was Roddenberry that said they never did it in a show because of the cost or someone else....fun fact.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Adam-Schoenwald In reply to DarthSparrow [2011-05-16 22:07:32 +0000 UTC]
They're are a beautiful ship, but turns like a beached whale.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DarthSparrow In reply to Adam-Schoenwald [2011-05-17 04:56:22 +0000 UTC]
Look at their size. Little impulse motors & really big ship. Sovereign as huge impulse to turns like a drunk girl ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlastorZingari [2011-05-16 08:30:27 +0000 UTC]
The Gal models could use a bit more love (and the Gal-x could probably use a choice to remove the third nacelle i've seen people ask for it). Honestly every ship model in the game has some issues mostly small.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adam-Schoenwald In reply to AlastorZingari [2011-05-16 22:06:21 +0000 UTC]
Agreed... the third nacelle just doesn't look right on how it connected to the ship, it looses some of its "sleekness".
👍: 0 ⏩: 0