robert-kim-karen [2009-10-06 20:26:13 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful exposure in this one. It looks like it could be an HDR by how well balanced it is. Love the verticle orientation too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
adamlack In reply to robert-kim-karen [2009-10-07 14:36:15 +0000 UTC]
Cheers, glad you like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AndrewToPhotography [2009-09-03 19:07:09 +0000 UTC]
Wow man. That's fantastic. I had taken one inside St Paul's but it's no where near as good as yours, so I won't upload it.
adamlack In reply to AndrewToPhotography [2009-09-03 19:11:02 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Cheers for the s too, I appreciate it.Oh, go on, do, you've made me want to see it now!
AndrewToPhotography In reply to adamlack [2009-09-03 19:15:55 +0000 UTC]
No way, you'll die from laughter. Trust me, it's shit. It's rather grainy and has a lot of noise because the high ISO about 3200. I didn't have tripod either. Hence, it never made it passed my quality control. Someone needs to invent a tripod that fits in your pocket easily and extends to a fully featured one. Do you use the tripod a lot for your shots?
adamlack In reply to AndrewToPhotography [2009-09-03 19:31:00 +0000 UTC]
What if I need cheering up? Indeed, I wouldn't mind one of those. Mine's not too bad for carrying around though, it's fairly light and not huge in it's bag. I didn't have it with me this day anyway, so everything from the cathedral and around it is shot handheld I tend to use it if I've got it, which is quite often, but sometimes I can't be bothered if it's only a 2 or 3 image stitch. I should really use it more, I probably only use it about 50-60% of the time I 'shoot to stitch'. (=
aimeecw [2009-09-03 18:59:43 +0000 UTC]
i really love the top half, it really makes you feel that you're staring up at the ceiling, getting all dizzy i'm not too sure about the bottom half though...the two images dont seem to fit together that well.
adamlack In reply to aimeecw [2009-09-03 19:06:27 +0000 UTC]
hehe, well I like it all ^^ it's 90 degrees from straight ahead to straight up (=glad you like some of it at least
aimeecw In reply to adamlack [2009-09-03 19:24:38 +0000 UTC]
i do like it! but i dunno, maybe i'm a little silly
adamlack In reply to aimeecw [2009-09-03 19:27:17 +0000 UTC]
nah, it's your opinion