Comments: 24
marijeberting [2017-10-08 18:19:31 +0000 UTC]
Superb Petr
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DennisReed [2017-10-08 17:53:32 +0000 UTC]
stunning
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
12CArt [2017-10-08 16:10:55 +0000 UTC]
BRAVO ! ! !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GBLXVIII [2017-10-08 13:14:24 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AI-Visions [2017-10-08 12:42:29 +0000 UTC]
Cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lalsweden [2017-10-08 12:01:19 +0000 UTC]
Hi Petr.
This one rendering of Yours, as Yours quite often
are, is 'most pleasing'.
A question - You used to publish renderings,
to a slightly greater detail (normally better
height, like 1200px, or so).
When changing resolution, why not increase
instead of decrease, resolution used?
I can't get that?
This, as it is detrimental, to quality.
Here, an alternative, to the music link
given by You;
Estas Tonne @ Kreuzkirche - Dresden;
Rebirth of a thought : Between Fire & Water
www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3KTeg…
Here, a 'long version', by Estas;
Estas Tonné - Internal Flight (1,48 hours)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4jgr8…
Thank You,
L
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lalsweden In reply to AkuraPare [2017-10-09 01:12:00 +0000 UTC]
Hi Petr.
Thank You for Your very kind answer.
My name is (for the time being), Lars.
I am very happy to see such wonderful talent being showcased,
both here, with artstation, and quite possibly other places too.
As internet evolve, monitors are upgraded resolutionwise, and at
same time peoples knowledge of what is a good image, will also
grow.
The effect of this being, when on internet and showcasing ones
art, one will need present that art, to proper resolution.
What that will be, I don't know. What that is today, is either
1440p, or 2160p.
I would guess a proper size for a rendering of todays, to showcase
on internet, would be something like ?
My monitor is 2160p (3840 * 2160), sadly built to 9:16. Yes, I
would prefer 10:16, and at times even 3:4 (old format), but
pretty rarely 9:16.
I currently try to 'get away' from 1080p, and look more to 2160p,
and (due to lack of 2160p good renderings of good quality art),
also 1440p.
So, these are the resolutions, I would appreciate, from You;
height 2160 px to 2400px (the same height in px as 2160 when
using 10:16 resolution).
Now, as 1440p is currently more used than 2160p, I would accept
and get happy, also for good art presented at resolutions of(height)
1600px. (the proper height in px, at 10:16, and with a width of
screen of 2560px).
...
Reasons for such sharing of ones art, as usual is for creative minds,
stem from a liking to share that which one does, ones efforts -
but with a hope to also get payment, for that art one makes.
Internet, to my view, is not the best of places to use, to get
such payment (a salary).
Why?
Because there is so much good stuff available at internet; because
one does not need to pay, to get new images for use in ones
computer.
I have written a note, on copyright, and how to make it possible for
DeviantArt artists to get an income, from art.
You can find an earlier draft of that paper, on this link -
Copyright, and how to make money, for the artist.
Thank You,
L
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tdcooke [2017-10-08 04:09:00 +0000 UTC]
translucent squid.....excellent
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tdcooke In reply to AkuraPare [2017-10-08 23:05:57 +0000 UTC]
very welcome petr
👍: 0 ⏩: 0