Comments: 25
Namurex [2020-05-20 16:18:11 +0000 UTC]
Taaaaaaaaaaaaaaasty. Art wise. Why is this just........ YOU IDIOT THIS IS WHERE DARKLORD OF PLEASURE'S EFFECT!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlanMac95 In reply to Namurex [2020-05-20 16:33:45 +0000 UTC]
Read all effects dumbdumb
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
0ccums-Razor [2020-05-19 10:56:23 +0000 UTC]
OOH, I like this....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AcesCards [2020-05-19 10:39:32 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Raxu-Rangerking [2020-03-12 04:54:42 +0000 UTC]
Wish this was real.
Konami would have a tantrum over this card art, but the card itself is legit really good; it would be OP, except that Harpies are pretty bad, and need something this strong. A direct attacker with double protection, one of which is a field buff, and a quick-effect Monster Reborn within its archetype. Even in a non-harpy deck, couldn't you combo into this and have a blocker that your opponent just can't interact with outside of burning 2 board-wipes?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Train48 [2017-01-20 21:53:24 +0000 UTC]
If this was to be made real, this would have some 'big' censorship. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
280077s [2017-01-20 20:38:18 +0000 UTC]
What about Cyber Harpies pet dragon? A rank 7 perhaps?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlanMac95 In reply to 280077s [2017-01-20 20:45:40 +0000 UTC]
if the artwork is available ............why not
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
280077s In reply to AlanMac95 [2017-01-20 20:49:31 +0000 UTC]
I'm surprised Konami didn't make an official rank 7 for Harpies, given what Channeler does.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
280077s In reply to deviantfan16 [2018-03-12 20:48:31 +0000 UTC]
Since when? What's the card's name?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
deviantfan16 In reply to 280077s [2018-03-12 21:07:22 +0000 UTC]
Harpie's Pet Phantasmal Dragon
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
280077s In reply to deviantfan16 [2018-03-12 21:22:17 +0000 UTC]
The is not a rank 7, its a rank 4...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
deviantfan16 In reply to 280077s [2018-03-12 21:34:04 +0000 UTC]
- -
)-(
I done fudged up
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KuriMaster13 [2017-01-20 19:48:08 +0000 UTC]
You can use Any? Xyz monster for it's summon? Ok then.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1