HOME | DD

Alannah-Hawker — Zack 06

Published: 2011-02-25 22:18:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 3534; Favourites: 229; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description ZACK! Too many reptiles lately?
06/01/11


_______________________________________________________
Prints available on my website: www.alannahhawker.com
_______________________________________________________

More of my work:
Related content
Comments: 90

Alannah-Hawker In reply to ??? [2011-10-31 16:22:08 +0000 UTC]

Again this one is with the 450, so I couldn't bump the ISO much, whereas I can now. I would probably have bumped up to f8 again.

Zack doesn't stop moving either, so getting a close up is hard work. As well as this, the closer I get to him, the more he moves! So the composing has to be done very quickly. Along with focusing etc. so it's a hard job!

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chikrata In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-11-01 03:56:51 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. That's the joy of a better body. ISO is more useful than most people realise

I know it is!! I just have to be critical

Welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AngiWallace [2011-02-27 21:45:34 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


This is brilliant Alannah.
I feel that it could only be improved with more depth of field, just enough so that the outline of his nose is and the upper part of his eyelid is all in focus.
Maybe try F13/14 to get all his nose etc in focus when so close up next time to see if it works, you know what its like with macro, the closer you get the shallower the DOF. But having the eye in focus and the gentle fall off in focus still works nicely. The other way you could do this but get more of him in focus would be to back off slightly and get more of him in the frame, then crop it in photoshop, but then you would end up with a smaller image.
Its very nicely lit, what lighting did you use?
Still a 98% out of 100 from me.
Great composition, details and colours too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to AngiWallace [2011-02-27 22:01:09 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much for the critique Angi,
I did want to use about F13, but you know what the light is like at the moment, very dark and dull, and I don't like using flash on them really, so I just had to work with the light I had.
I used these lights - [link] I can't really afford any proper lights at the moment, but these seem to work fairly well I might try buying a higher watt bulb for them to try and get at least f8

Thanks again Angi

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

PhilS1761 In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2014-07-21 02:20:41 +0000 UTC]

Noo one mentioned shutter speed. You can use a higher f stop if you use a slower speed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to PhilS1761 [2014-07-27 20:32:32 +0000 UTC]

I didn't say anyone mentioned shutter speed?
I know how apertures/shutters speeds/ISOs work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AngiWallace In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-02-27 22:15:06 +0000 UTC]

I know what you mean regarding flash, I prefer to bounce the flash rather than fire it directly at them.
Another soloution in the reduced lighting could be to increase your ISO - I forgot to look what you had it set at

Yet anothersoloution to help increase your light could be using a reflector, you can buy 5 in one reflectors on ebay quite cheap, but I sometimes use a piece of A4 card covered in foil for small subjects, but it can be difficult getting it propped in just the right position, a small beanbag can help, or an extra hand

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to AngiWallace [2011-02-27 22:21:48 +0000 UTC]

I have the ISO on 400 in this shot, once I hit 800 the noise becomes obvious though, and the quality instantly lowered..

Hmmm, would a reflector be much help though? I have the tent set up in front of a glass door, with one light each side of the tent. I only really have light problems in winter though that's the thing. Otherwise I might consider investing in a flash or more expensive lighting.
Would you have the reflector in the tent then or what?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AngiWallace In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-02-27 22:42:36 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I find the same with the 450D the noise is noticable at 800ISO, annoying really.

The reflector would only help inside the tent, it would not increase light enormously though, but have a play with a piece of foil on something in the house, or even on someones face where lighting is only good from one side and you will see quite a difference. You will need to play around with positioning and angles though.
Mind you if you were using a light tent that should have reflected some light anyway. How about losing the light tent, using your lights with a white diffuser cover and using a reflector.
I find the reflectors very useful for reducing shadows. I know a few people use small reflectors or foil to photograph mushrooms out in the woods, no additional lighting or anything, but just that extra little bit from the reflector helps to get magical lighting.

Not all Flashes are expensive. I use Yongnuo flashes which are incredibly cheap and I have found to be reliable too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to AngiWallace [2011-03-17 18:13:18 +0000 UTC]

Hmm, maybe i'll try build some mini reflectors I can place in the tent. I kinda need the tent thought otherwise Zack&Zee will just run off lol. They've already discovered they can climb onto my camera sometimes! Naughty little monsters

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SnowPoring In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-02-27 22:13:16 +0000 UTC]

Might be worth trying higher ISO settings to get the smaller apertures in similar conditions, and see how you feel about that tradeoff?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to SnowPoring [2011-02-27 22:17:33 +0000 UTC]

ISO at 400 is okay, but once I hit 800 it becomes noticeable and quality is lowered. One reason I want a new camera body

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-02-27 22:37:53 +0000 UTC]

I don't think the 450D is that bad myself, I use it to 1600 and even wish it had a 3200 setting

Is it only noise? Or the reduced dynamic range also a problem too? Noise can be controlled by noise reduction software or if you go raw, a good converter will handle it nicely. But either way yes it does start to cost fine detail when pixel peeping. Dynamic range is harder and to me leads to dull looking images however much you process after.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to SnowPoring [2011-03-17 18:18:44 +0000 UTC]

Wow really?

I use RAW now, but the noise thing in there only seems to work on colour noise..

Things seem to look a lot less sharp with high ISO too which I don't like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SnowPoring In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-03-17 18:27:43 +0000 UTC]

The detail loss at high ISO I don't think will ever really be overcome short of a revolution in imaging techniques. I go for "good enough" not pixel perfect every time.

Definitely noise is a problem, colour noise is the easy one to process. You can get rid of remaining grain but usually that just makes everything look blurry. So the fine grain from a good converter is often preferable.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tawneeleaf [2015-10-31 01:07:34 +0000 UTC]

There is no such thing as too many reptiles!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to Tawneeleaf [2016-01-16 22:33:46 +0000 UTC]

I will agree with that!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Malesx [2012-11-20 00:51:10 +0000 UTC]

so scary but very nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to Malesx [2012-11-20 17:27:00 +0000 UTC]

Aw he's not scary

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Malesx In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2012-11-20 21:18:18 +0000 UTC]

but i see it scary

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sawiscool [2012-03-26 05:04:00 +0000 UTC]

His Eye is amazing, And the texture is awesome. Can't love this enough!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to Sawiscool [2012-04-17 16:34:28 +0000 UTC]

Aw thank you, I love his eyes too, so dinosaur like

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

spooky-dream [2011-10-11 21:44:42 +0000 UTC]

he is so perfect

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to spooky-dream [2011-10-14 19:57:55 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

spooky-dream In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-10-14 21:08:20 +0000 UTC]

welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheRedRussian [2011-08-24 08:24:11 +0000 UTC]

his eyes are gorgeous

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to TheRedRussian [2011-08-25 17:08:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, he's a very beautiful little monster..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Arti-vibe [2011-06-07 01:04:37 +0000 UTC]

i love leopard geckos

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to Arti-vibe [2011-06-08 17:21:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TwistedHearts [2011-03-22 22:01:13 +0000 UTC]

Still one of my favs of Zack . I just can't get enough - never too many .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to TwistedHearts [2011-03-30 00:54:31 +0000 UTC]

Yay! I just love his eyes

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TwistedHearts In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-03-31 20:52:35 +0000 UTC]

Post more, yes?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MeltedSculpture [2011-03-04 05:44:43 +0000 UTC]

wow.. i love the clarity !!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to MeltedSculpture [2011-03-05 00:41:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Spuderific [2011-02-28 23:03:49 +0000 UTC]

GECKOZILLA!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to Spuderific [2011-03-16 01:33:04 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spuderific In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-03-16 01:55:35 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

S7alker117 [2011-02-27 22:21:23 +0000 UTC]

Wow. Just... wow!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to S7alker117 [2011-03-11 21:34:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

S7alker117 In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-03-11 21:37:53 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AngiWallace [2011-02-27 21:39:24 +0000 UTC]

This is brilliant Alannah. Maybe try F13/14 to get all his nose etc in focus when so close up sometime to see if it works, you know what its like with macro, the closer you get the shallower the DOF. Still a 98% out of 100 from me.
Great composition, details and colours too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to AngiWallace [2011-04-29 20:41:59 +0000 UTC]

Will do next time, was mainly playing with the new lens and seeing how it all works.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Velvet-Paw [2011-02-27 12:49:53 +0000 UTC]

Cutle lil Zack! I love this shot Alannah.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to Velvet-Paw [2011-03-11 21:32:02 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Julia, he's amazingggggg

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Velvet-Paw In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-03-12 14:05:01 +0000 UTC]

You are very welcome. He's an extremly cute little guy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jaffacakesandpopcorn [2011-02-26 22:03:55 +0000 UTC]

Great shot, interesting patterns on his eyes! His skin looks like its made of tiny hundreds and thousands! do they like being stroked, or do they bite?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to jaffacakesandpopcorn [2011-02-26 22:13:09 +0000 UTC]

They don't mind being stroked, it depends how they've been raised though. Zee lets you stroke her head, and loves being stroked under the chin. Whereas Zack doesn't like his head or chin being touched, he lets me sometimes, but no one else. But he lets anyone touched his back/belly

They only bite if I've touched their food and can smell it on my hand, or if they're eating and I put my hand in lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jaffacakesandpopcorn In reply to Alannah-Hawker [2011-02-26 22:15:54 +0000 UTC]

Ah thats good, helps when dressing them up too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chikrata [2011-02-26 21:03:07 +0000 UTC]

I still love this shot

His eye's amazing ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alannah-Hawker In reply to Chikrata [2011-02-26 21:35:32 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Lawrie, he's my mini dinosaur

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>