HOME | DD
Alphadork β Is it porn?
[NSFW]
Published: 2007-10-22 18:17:06 +0000 UTC; Views: 20823; Favourites: 178; Downloads: 187
Redirect to original
Description
Again the inimitable Gwen - Eric Kroll's muse. I am convinced that the difference between art, erotica, and porn is all a function of the shoes. The other two thirds of this triptych are elsewhere in my gallery.Regardless, for the censors at dA: Please be aware that the model's right index finger is neither touching nor penetrating her genitals in this photo.
Related content
Comments: 37
I just dont understand why people degrade theirselves like this....
π: 0 β©: 0
People, pleeease learn the difference between being a porn "artist" and nude artist. There's no such thing as a "porn artist." Porn is just porn. This here would probably be nude art, if not for it looking SO suggestive.. Just saying, if you don't agree and want to complain about people like me destroying your freedom of creativity, then gtfo of DA FOREVER, BIACH. YOUR "ART" IS NOT APPRECIATED BY (NOT ALL) LOTS OF PEOPLE HERE. SO LEAVE AND TAKE YOUR DEFENSIVE A$$ WITH YOU.
Draw whatever you want, but DA is for EROTIC and NUDE art. Not people fingering, spreading, having sex, being overly playful, etc. So get out if you wanna post that so we don't have to report you.Β
Remember about "creative freedom" and "being able to express yourself?" This is my PERSONAL OPINION. If you disagree, I don't give a f*ck so don't be an a$$.
Since when did SHOES matter? Seriously, WTF? Where did your logic gland go?
π: 0 β©: 0
Brilliant concept!!!! Take that, anti-porn assholes of DA! I love the lighting and the shade of the background and the material! Green FTW
π: 0 β©: 0
FAQ #565: You prohibit the submission of 'pornographic imagery'; what do you consider this to be?
π: 0 β©: 0
This is art, no matter the function of her finger
π: 0 β©: 0
This is a wonderful beginning of your work. Good choice. I think that is a branch of art which has become the porn.
π: 0 β©: 0
I think that the fact that its intention is to make you question yourself if its or not porn automatically convert it to art , my opinion.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you! If that's the test, though, I could make some really trashy "art"
This was part of a triptych in which I was merely (and toung-in-cheekly) trying to posit that the difference between porn, erotica, and art is purely a function of the shoes.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hahaha well thats not what i meant to express, its more like when there are divided opinions, some get offended and some other look beyond, very trashy "art" will be definitely porn, no one will defend it as art, and the fact that u question it in the title brings it to another context, it reminds me of DuchampΒ΄s toilet.
But also your shoes thing is very interesting but then u say that if the subject have shoes it becomes porn?
π: 0 β©: 2
Here are the other two images:
[link]
[link]
π: 0 β©: 0
The basic calculus I was working with was gym shoes = art
no shoes = erotica
heels = porn
... more or less ... but it was all meant to be humorous. Even having my stuff and the name Duchamp mentioned in the same breath is ridiculously flattering to me - thank you.
π: 0 β©: 1
Really i think its a great idea/concept, there are a lot of nudes here , beautiful by the way, but its not usual to find this kind of conceptualization and thats what caught me here, and yes its humorous. And finally u are welcome, im sure that many people wont agree at all about my DuchampΒ΄s comparision, but... who cares, thats my humble opinion. 
π: 0 β©: 1
it,s funny. And good choice for the women to.
π: 0 β©: 1
welcome please check out my artwork if you have not already?
π: 0 β©: 0
This is a risque 'Ha Ha, I DARE you' type of photograph XD lol
I love it
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you very much!
π: 0 β©: 0
I think this is really tasteful. It's nearly porn.. but not quite....
π: 0 β©: 1
It actually got pulled the first time I posted it, but I reviewed the guidelines with a magnifying glass and couldn't find a violation, so I put it back up with a little preemptive note. I'm glad you like it - thanks!
π: 0 β©: 0
this is one of your best--I think everything is perfect...the lighting, the model, the crisp focus, the pose, the commentary...very well done.
π: 0 β©: 1
- Putting the Art Back into Artistic Nudes - Journal
Please look here: [link]
π: 0 β©: 1
In my honest opinion, close, but not there.
π: 0 β©: 1
What would you have done differently?
π: 0 β©: 1
body language. I wouldn't have told her to put her fingers in that general area
π: 0 β©: 1
I didn't - she's a talented model - she took my concept and gave me the pose.
π: 0 β©: 0