HOME | DD

Amalia-Illios β€” Private

#bondage #cuffed #gagged #highheels #minidress #platforms #secondlife #whitehair #strippershoes
Published: 2015-12-28 14:44:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 6112; Favourites: 91; Downloads: 242
Redirect to original
Description Members only! I guess they do really mean that ...
Related content
Comments: 44

mythiac [2018-10-02 16:15:45 +0000 UTC]

She's about to get acquainted with a lot of members of this club!

He's going to takeΒ  her into the back room, where her dress will be removed.Β  She's actually already braless and has on an extremely skimpy g-string thong, which will also be removed.

She'll then be shackled down to a bed, where over the course of the next few months hundreds and hundreds of club members (both male and female) and their invited guests will fondle, tease, and grope her, and violate all three of her holes with cocks, fingers and all sorts of other objects!

Eventually she may learn not to try to crash a private club!

She always thought her good looks and incredible body was all the invitation she ever needed...but she will soon learn differently!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to mythiac [2018-10-08 14:37:08 +0000 UTC]

Thong? What thong?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Zabhela111 [2018-04-12 15:01:40 +0000 UTC]

Mixed race couples are so sexy. Wonderful image

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to Zabhela111 [2018-04-12 16:36:05 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! But, uhmmmm ... they're not exactly a couple.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

IreneWhite23 [2016-06-23 14:59:31 +0000 UTC]

Apart from the gag love the outfit

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to IreneWhite23 [2016-06-24 06:29:36 +0000 UTC]

She didn't really plan on that being an accessory to her outfit, I think.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

IreneWhite23 In reply to Amalia-Illios [2016-06-24 06:35:31 +0000 UTC]

Planned or not always nice to have haha...another dress and heels to add to the shopping list

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ala33 [2016-04-25 03:42:17 +0000 UTC]

caught by lurch and taking her to see pugsly adams

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to ala33 [2016-04-28 09:07:50 +0000 UTC]

Now there's an interesting interpretation. I like!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

irvingb [2016-03-09 01:53:02 +0000 UTC]

Actually, it looks like somebody just became a member...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to irvingb [2016-03-09 06:29:41 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm ... I'd ask, but she hasn't been seen since.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tulsatrash [2016-01-01 21:51:42 +0000 UTC]

does she have an inflatable bulb locked and expanded in her pussy to force her lower tummy to bulge like that or does she just naturally have a cute little swell in her lower tummy/upper pelvis?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to Tulsatrash [2016-01-02 05:01:00 +0000 UTC]

No bulbs, all natural. Well, almost all of her.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jwBronyTFanime20 [2015-12-29 04:17:51 +0000 UTC]

that right there is why I am considering on getting a job as a bouncer

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to jwBronyTFanime20 [2015-12-29 07:08:43 +0000 UTC]

Bouncing blonde boppers by bondage because bouncing boobage?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

19Enigma80 [2015-12-28 18:32:02 +0000 UTC]

interesting

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to 19Enigma80 [2015-12-28 20:47:20 +0000 UTC]

I suppose seeing a bouncer do his job can be. At least from a distance.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

19Enigma80 In reply to Amalia-Illios [2015-12-28 21:15:14 +0000 UTC]

yes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jarvik2009 [2015-12-28 17:01:13 +0000 UTC]

Oh if only that would happen to the Kardashians!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to jarvik2009 [2015-12-28 17:18:32 +0000 UTC]

But, but, but ... Kim's been wearing soooooo much Atsuko Kudo lately, that practically makes her one of us, doesn't it?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dannysuling In reply to Amalia-Illios [2015-12-28 18:18:52 +0000 UTC]

No, it doesn't. It's all surface and posing and Holloywood unreality. The necessary corrective is to get all that family into some real bondage peril and make their bodies do all the wonderful things WE want them to do!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to dannysuling [2015-12-28 21:03:03 +0000 UTC]

Gee, I dunno ... ... they might not make it out alive, I think.

Incidentally, it's amazing how little impact media phenomena like them will have on your life if you decide to renounce television.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dannysuling In reply to Amalia-Illios [2015-12-29 07:08:14 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely right! Couldn't agree more.

There are, of course, other less drastic options, such as allowing for TV watching but never listening to local news, never tuning in any reality shows, never watching political debates or any talking heads, and viewing everything else on the boob tube (including all sports at every level) with a degree of skepticism that borders on cynicism. Does that make TV as a medium unentertaining? Of course not! Imaging treating everything on TV...everything... with irony and skepticism and a hearty willingness to suspend (very, very temporarily) disbelief just for the fun of doing so.

As in:

"Kim Kardashian? Well, I'd fuck her, but only if she were gagged and blindfolded, and bound into a position that allowed me access to any of her holes at any time, in any manner, and for any length of time, that I chose. She will climax, eat, drink, pee, poop, and express herself in words only when and how I want her to. And it won't be often."

What was that I thought I heard you say just now? That she's a real person and deserves respect and that the above is a horrible fantasy? Well, let me simply say that she's not a real person, not in the sense that you and I really mean when we talk about real lives. She lives in a nasty and self-reinforcing bubble that bears no resemblance to the hopes, dreams, fears, and activities of typical people worrying about their typical lives. As such, I feel quite justified in replacing her own current fantasy life with one more conducive to my own preferences.

"And that," as they say, "is THAT!"

(Whew! Got a little carried away, didn't I?)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to dannysuling [2015-12-29 09:21:32 +0000 UTC]

Yes, you did.

It's going to be nine years that I swore off television and I don't regret it one bit. And it has gotten to the point where, to me, it is no longer entertaining in large parts. Information needs can be filled using other sources -- and in a less obtrusive and annoying and more comprehensive way at that.

So people like said family exist mostly in name only and little bits and fragments that find their way to me regardless. Tagged as irrelevant, some of it may actually stick though if it intersects with other interests, like said connection to Atsuko Kudo. Which of course I view with much of the same cynicism you mentioned.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dannysuling In reply to Amalia-Illios [2015-12-29 16:11:22 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps I'm too old, now, but I can't get into admiring and using on-line sources as reliable purveyors of reliable information. If anything, there's more bias there (and it's more nefarious and less easily combatable) than with traditional media. We've got only each other to depend on, as we take our tentative steps further into the future!

Shoulder to shoulder, I say!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to dannysuling [2015-12-30 05:25:10 +0000 UTC]

No need to admire anything. And at no point did I refer to online sources. Generally media should be taken with a healthy amount of scepticism and sources cross-checked if the information presented is in any kind relevant.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dannysuling In reply to Amalia-Illios [2015-12-30 06:53:54 +0000 UTC]

I believe we're in agreement, even though my specifics came with some assumptions. You're right to point that out.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ForestWolfDragon [2015-12-28 15:10:40 +0000 UTC]

Amalia.....tsk tsk!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to ForestWolfDragon [2015-12-28 16:06:55 +0000 UTC]

What?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ForestWolfDragon In reply to Amalia-Illios [2015-12-28 16:34:56 +0000 UTC]

I swear you are always looking for trouble!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to ForestWolfDragon [2015-12-28 16:56:01 +0000 UTC]

To put it into the timeless words of : Pfft!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

TrixieHobble In reply to Amalia-Illios [2016-01-02 23:04:25 +0000 UTC]

Β There needs to be a slight correction here...Β Lia is usually at the root cause of trouble!!! Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to TrixieHobble [2016-01-03 08:50:17 +0000 UTC]

Surely you meant to write that I am the root cause of trouble!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TrixieHobble In reply to Amalia-Illios [2016-01-07 20:45:20 +0000 UTC]

Β Potato...Potado... Ether way you are at the cause somewhere or the other Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ForestWolfDragon In reply to Amalia-Illios [2015-12-28 17:01:12 +0000 UTC]

and you would look great together in latex gear and being lead around on leashes . Β So her Pfft! would be more of MMPH! lol.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

TrixieHobble In reply to ForestWolfDragon [2016-01-02 23:10:49 +0000 UTC]

Β How did I get dragged into this discussion...Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ForestWolfDragon In reply to TrixieHobble [2016-01-03 23:13:59 +0000 UTC]

Most carefully if how you got dragged in Trixie .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TrixieHobble In reply to ForestWolfDragon [2016-01-07 20:42:00 +0000 UTC]

Β  Β  Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Amalia-Illios In reply to ForestWolfDragon [2015-12-28 17:15:40 +0000 UTC]

Odd you should say that, her "Pfft!" frequently did end up sounding like "Mmph!" ...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

TrixieHobble In reply to Amalia-Illios [2016-01-02 23:12:45 +0000 UTC]

Β I rest my case...Β Proof Lia is usually at the root cause of trouble!!! Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Amalia-Illios In reply to TrixieHobble [2016-01-03 08:49:02 +0000 UTC]

Nope. I'm prime evil, remember?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TrixieHobble In reply to Amalia-Illios [2016-01-07 20:47:50 +0000 UTC]

You ... are....Β  well.. Something to be sure. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ForestWolfDragon In reply to Amalia-Illios [2015-12-28 17:41:41 +0000 UTC]

Then all the more reason I should lead you ladies around for a day lol.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TrixieHobble In reply to ForestWolfDragon [2016-01-02 23:13:17 +0000 UTC]

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0