HOME | DD

Thorcsf In reply to aratkrision [2015-10-28 23:38:01 +0000 UTC]

It's an effect of the flash. When the flash is triggered it lightens the drops; as the flash light is extinguishing, the drops continue to fall and you have that fade out effect, as the light is going off. If the brighter side were in the bottom, that's when the rain would be going upwards. I'm surprised you are a photographer and you didn't know that. I guess you have never shot or seen a studio photo with falling water like that, then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

aratkrision In reply to Thorcsf [2016-01-21 02:42:43 +0000 UTC]

sorry dude but the effect looks like it is raining upwards, no matter what you say  the final produc looks inverted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

aratkrision In reply to aratkrision [2016-01-21 02:44:05 +0000 UTC]

oh by the way as a photographer you need to know how to adjust your settings and your flash duration to make it look correct

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Thorcsf In reply to aratkrision [2016-04-11 00:00:14 +0000 UTC]

And another one here that I found by chance on DA a few days later, by another great photographer - Stefan Grosjean: stefangrosjean.deviantart.com/… .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thorcsf In reply to aratkrision [2016-04-03 03:06:07 +0000 UTC]

Haha, OK, then. I say this by experience. Not from my own work, but I've seen countless studio photoshoots from different pro photographers with "studio rain/shower" like that, and the effect always look the same; though it is only visible on a dark background, like in Anastasya's picture.

Here, I've gathered some low-resolution samples from seven different photosets from MetArt, with "studio rain/shower", by two of the top MetArt photographers: Rylsky and Antonio Clemens. I'll see that in all of the photos, the water drops are more shiny at the top and fainter at the bottom: www.turboimagehost.com/album/1… .
You may have to click on "Original Image Size", on the upper left, to see the effect clearly. The effect is more visible in the three Night A's photos, where she's dressing a colorful dress.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0