HOME | DD

AndyBuck — Epiphone Gothic SG without AMP

Published: 2005-06-03 10:36:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 3684; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 183
Redirect to original
Description This is my friends gothic sg, modeled from a photograph. may not be totally accurate cus i only had a 2 pictures to work from. This is the final render for this guitar but i am guna make the amp to go with it later on. I am submitting this on its own because of the ludacrisly high render time 1hr 24mins!!! Anyway hope you all like it and hope to hear your thoughts. ENJOY!!!!!!!


Program used:- Cinema4d, also used to render
render time:- 1hr 24mins!!!
Machine:- AMD64 3000+ 2.04GHz, 1Gb RAM, XFX 6600GT 500/1000, Abit KV8 MAX3
Related content
Comments: 27

NaeRey [2008-02-18 22:41:23 +0000 UTC]

nice nice!!
though lacks a scene... which you will do later on, right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xCorpse13x [2007-04-05 13:57:54 +0000 UTC]

Holy crap, was just scanning through some pages and I saw this. I thought, "Wow, that guy must take really good care of his guitar, it's so clean. Way better looking than mine."

....

I peed my pants a little upon realizing this was a render.


Very very nice work, sir!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AndyBuck In reply to xCorpse13x [2007-04-05 17:15:12 +0000 UTC]

haha! oops thanks dude! much appreciated

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ferdinandstrat [2006-03-21 08:29:02 +0000 UTC]

Looks like the Tony Iommi signiture guitar.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lennex [2005-08-05 22:11:44 +0000 UTC]

Wicked ass render! Obviously you needed more photos to get some of the details. But I'm a gutiar stickler and am really bad at pointing stuff out... like the fact that the real SG Gothic has a smaller pickguard, black knobs, black input jack, black toggle switch cavity, the headstock should also taper off more for that 'gibson' angled headstock look. However, this is art, it's not supposed to be like the real thing right? I could only wish to do models as well as you anyways...

Great work man, keep it up! Your amazing at this crap now, I can't wait to see your future stuff!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AndyBuck In reply to lennex [2005-08-06 14:07:32 +0000 UTC]

i worked off a couple of crappy references which i dont think were the correct guitar anyway lol so i cant say anything for accuracy

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

starsarentout [2005-07-14 22:19:42 +0000 UTC]

i was just in college with kids who would wish they were as good as you at 3d modeling. keep up the awesome job

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AndyBuck In reply to starsarentout [2005-07-14 23:20:11 +0000 UTC]

WOW!! cooooool thanks loooads for the comment, and thanks to all the guys at the college. Im submitting a sick chevy truck, ICE'd out stay tuned.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

starsarentout [2005-07-14 22:19:09 +0000 UTC]

i was just in college with kids who would wish they were as good as you at 3d modeling. keep up the awesome job

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

valadorf [2005-07-11 14:06:13 +0000 UTC]

cool stuff and nice machine you've got there (amd64). mind doing a bass sometime?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AndyBuck In reply to valadorf [2005-07-11 14:11:47 +0000 UTC]

thank you! nice as it is i still need a more powerful one, going to upgrade next year possibly an amd64 x2

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sakey [2005-06-06 21:06:08 +0000 UTC]

looks kool, great work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jake-poohead [2005-06-05 16:31:56 +0000 UTC]

dude, you've got problems, why did you just diss andy like that? just cos you don't think his guitar is as good as that other one doesnt mean you can just say his work sucks. personally i preffer andy's SG, but you dont see me going onto that other guy's work and telling him it sucks do you? sure you are entitled to your opinions, but you don't have to be nasty, maybe you should try being nice about people's work once in a while and people might start to like you. please be nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

phoneyakk [2005-06-04 14:27:22 +0000 UTC]

[link] must I say more, ohh yea this sucks hard!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

steveee In reply to phoneyakk [2005-06-11 15:13:14 +0000 UTC]

i am with jake ere, with an effort and a render like that, to say that hours worth of work sucks ass then you have some issues!!! But can i ask, if you know "all" then wtf is wrong with this model then?? This render is everything but rubbish, this is the best piece of work andy has produced yet, and i have seen his first ever model and this has come on rediculos amounts from those, andy is probobly the best modeler i know as a friend nd wht you said is wrong m8, wrong.
In conclusion, GET YOUR HEAD SORTED PALL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AndyBuck In reply to phoneyakk [2005-06-04 14:37:41 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the vote of confidence there

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nathy-d [2005-06-04 08:34:32 +0000 UTC]

great work man, and 1.24hours aint that bad at all,lol, i remember rendering out my stomper scene ( 10 hours...... ).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AndyBuck In reply to nathy-d [2005-06-04 10:06:00 +0000 UTC]

10hrs! jesus, thanks for the comments

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

8404 [2005-06-03 16:53:38 +0000 UTC]

nice materials looks better with them then without

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PaStiLhArT [2005-06-03 14:02:10 +0000 UTC]

awesome work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MyArms-YourHearse [2005-06-03 12:56:22 +0000 UTC]

Amazing, I thought it was real.. love that pic and the guitar of course, I only have a crappy Epiphone Les Paul Special II

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AndyBuck In reply to MyArms-YourHearse [2005-06-03 12:58:37 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the comment dude!! i have no idea what that is lol i just modeled this for a friend and for fun

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dark-Neo [2005-06-03 11:19:34 +0000 UTC]

very nice man!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

steveee [2005-06-03 10:40:07 +0000 UTC]

w0000000t, thts amazin'!!
Its obvious why it took 1hr 45mins to render, very good lighting, very good clean lines.
How many nurbs were in it in the end?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AndyBuck In reply to steveee [2005-06-03 10:42:53 +0000 UTC]

6 hyperNURBS, this is a lot but i couldnt think of another way to do what i had to so meh! Thanks for you comment dude really appriciate it, and the ova guy who commented in under 10 seconds of me posting lol!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

steveee In reply to AndyBuck [2005-06-03 10:43:55 +0000 UTC]

lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thalionrin [2005-06-03 10:37:51 +0000 UTC]

Holy crap, that is absolutely awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0