Comments: 40
axial [2007-03-05 11:54:32 +0000 UTC]
really nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gwennyput [2006-08-28 19:28:22 +0000 UTC]
BEAUTIFULL! wonderfull picture, really nic!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
mackenziec [2006-07-03 02:23:36 +0000 UTC]
wow, really REALLY nice!!!!!! your very good, stop by my gallery and let me know how i've done so far, i'd appreciate it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RIKOOSTENBROEK [2006-03-25 12:13:06 +0000 UTC]
damn nice, I love the chaos in it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AaronSmith [2006-03-14 19:58:20 +0000 UTC]
I love this man it looks awsome ... what did you use to make it ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
franzvanderlinde [2006-03-05 21:21:02 +0000 UTC]
clips, buildings, granades, waves and liquid... Words triggered... Some more softness might do it better, but that's cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
anesthetix In reply to franzvanderlinde [2006-03-06 00:12:05 +0000 UTC]
and that is why usually only i rely on people like he1z, niteangel, and others, to give me good comments, because he actually cares about what is put into a piece, not just what it looks like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Brandonc1 [2006-03-04 20:17:27 +0000 UTC]
Theres some sex.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TeraLink [2006-03-04 17:59:30 +0000 UTC]
Yes, very freestyle. Good job.
TeraLink Was Here!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
k0zz [2006-03-04 11:18:57 +0000 UTC]
not a bad piece, but maybe you could smooth things up_
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nathanspotts [2006-03-04 09:45:58 +0000 UTC]
Definitely your best in a loooong time! I love this one...
All of your new stuff has been a real step up; keep up the great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
masser [2006-03-04 06:58:50 +0000 UTC]
Cool render
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ghost-001- [2006-03-04 06:01:33 +0000 UTC]
very nice but needs typo and 2d
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
anesthetix In reply to Ghost-001- [2006-03-06 00:08:47 +0000 UTC]
Typo can be found at the very top of the page where it says
"deviantART: freestlye- by =anesthetix"
and typo isnt always good.
it would clash with this Flowing piece, it doesnt clash with the abstract explosions and such but this, isnt not that whored abstract art that you see everywhere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ghost-001- In reply to anesthetix [2006-03-06 04:16:32 +0000 UTC]
of course i know that about typo but this is a piece that could be so much better with good typo
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
n3v32bu2n In reply to Ghost-001- [2006-03-16 15:38:34 +0000 UTC]
Let go of trends and thinking that certain pieces 'need typo and 2D'. The piece speaks for itself and would be cluttered and quite unappealing with your suggestions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ghost-001- In reply to n3v32bu2n [2006-03-17 14:44:07 +0000 UTC]
it might be a trend but it doesnt really matter, in my personal opinion this piece could be better executed with typo and i disagree about it beign cluttered, if used in coherence to the flow of the piece the typo would not in any clutter it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
8404 [2006-03-04 05:23:39 +0000 UTC]
nice mate
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Grayve [2006-03-04 03:48:21 +0000 UTC]
Really nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
toThePixel [2006-03-04 02:15:02 +0000 UTC]
Interesting piece, it'ssomewhat lacking in composition tho, I personall would made more of a flow/depth feel by concentrating part of the render more, as to create more negitive space, because right now stuff is everywhere, and my eyes dont catch on to any part really.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
witmer777 [2006-03-04 01:26:04 +0000 UTC]
very nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ZenkoAshikaga [2006-03-04 01:17:00 +0000 UTC]
Possible your best to date.
nice work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
1ALPHA1 [2006-03-04 00:54:35 +0000 UTC]
really nice work..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0