Comments: 78
LeszekLeo [2012-11-27 13:50:31 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful! Beautiful! Beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acurmudgeon [2012-09-28 20:37:17 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
suyi80 [2012-09-20 02:04:14 +0000 UTC]
nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
luigirod49 [2012-09-17 17:19:23 +0000 UTC]
Man, the lighting on this is sick. Never knew the mesh tool can get this complex
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
marshallpro [2012-09-16 02:11:32 +0000 UTC]
HUH!! U have clearly out done yourself with the lighting and soft shadows in this piece!! Especially the furniture texture!! And also the girl with the "3D'z"...Nice!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AngstromAlliance In reply to marshallpro [2012-09-16 09:49:07 +0000 UTC]
Thank you Marcus.
That couch was a real pain to get right, especially with the changing depth of field on the damask covering. It's always nice when someone picks up on the finer details of what it takes to produce complex vectors that do justice to the original image.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
marshallpro In reply to AngstromAlliance [2012-09-16 12:25:18 +0000 UTC]
Well to some it maybe "miner details", but the "finer or miner" details are the ones that complete the image. I knw a few people the work with vectors frequently( I myself,But...*scuff*...not at that level)and it's not as straight 4ward as some may think it iz!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AngstromAlliance In reply to marshallpro [2012-09-16 16:18:57 +0000 UTC]
I agree, vectors are seldom straight forward, regardless of how complex they are. They all need thinking out and executing accurately.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kapyco [2012-09-14 20:34:37 +0000 UTC]
Sitting here with our friend and have to say elements like the shoes remind us of Jessica Rabbit - is it our perception or is that how the photo was. I'm really not sure about this perhaps the photo was already very manipulated. Your vector may do justice but doesn't do it for us. Sorry
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AngstromAlliance In reply to Kapyco [2012-09-15 23:39:30 +0000 UTC]
Well I thought I'd let this one breathe a while as I considered the best way to respond to this thoughtful posting. The only conclusion I can draw is this was some cruel attempt to undermine what I am trying to achieve as a practitioner of the vector arts, or these words are the product of dipsomaniacal or drug-addled thinking.
At best, if you see traces of Jessica Rabbit, you may be experiencing some kind of macular degeneration, in which case, a referal to an oculist is imperative.
The vast majority of people who post here have an appreciation or working knowledge about the various artforms on display. This invective laced diatribe may mask some deeper seated issues that should be addressed through counselling or therapy.
The good news is, if you are thinking of making a career change in the near future, you have all the traits and characteristics to be very succesful in marketing
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mrmd53 [2012-09-13 13:24:53 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful in Every Way!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankwyte81 [2012-09-13 04:22:28 +0000 UTC]
This turned out nice. you even nailed the texture on the couch. Overall A+ Phil, great job
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AngstromAlliance In reply to frankwyte81 [2012-09-13 07:29:57 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Frank, good to hear from you.
Yeah, I got the result I was looking for, which was pleasing. It turned out to be far more complicated than I reckoned on. It took ages to get the necklace how I wanted, though it just doesn't show up here - and that couch sent me boss-eyed.
Here's the dilemma, do you produce true vector that works when viewed at 6000%+, or something that just looks good on screen for people to enjoy looking at?
As you have pointed out in the past, nobody pays us for producing these, so how much time can you honestly justify on nailing details that will never be truly appreciated?
Problems, problems.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankwyte81 In reply to AngstromAlliance [2012-09-19 04:34:28 +0000 UTC]
You did a fantastic job, I can tell some those sections were difficult.
I been working a lot lately, hopefully I'll have time to finish the vectors I've been working on. Anything you produce with the mesh tool is a true vector. I printed a few of mine out and they look great, but a disclaimer, the biggest print I did was 24x36, but it still look good. As for the time to justify, that depends on the person, if you have available time, go for it. I'm putting about 30-40 hours in mine going forward.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankwyte81 In reply to AngstromAlliance [2012-09-23 07:47:42 +0000 UTC]
Oh ok. I printed my Unwind and Freckles piece. I printed them just to see how they look in print, that's all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
isoal [2012-09-13 00:10:17 +0000 UTC]
Unbelievable skill...and the inspiration is not bad either
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AngstromAlliance In reply to isoal [2012-09-13 00:14:07 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Sandy, I think being inspired by the subject makes the whole process far more rewarding.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shepperd65 [2012-09-12 14:16:35 +0000 UTC]
Great job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Aplos [2012-09-12 11:46:57 +0000 UTC]
and what a view!!
Ya know... when I enlarged it I said... there's something wrong with this photo... it seems too smooth... then i saw the category
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AngstromAlliance In reply to Aplos [2012-09-12 12:37:00 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Andreas. Some pictures lend themselves to trying to define every pore, but the lighting and the subject this lent themselves to a softer approach.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ocelot99992003 [2012-09-12 10:54:35 +0000 UTC]
very nice! with a bit more light play and texture to her ankles and the floor boards, this would be nearly photographic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AngstromAlliance In reply to ocelot99992003 [2012-09-12 12:46:14 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Tyler. It's like I said on Fate16's posting - it boils down to time in the end, so I have to judge what I think passes muster on artistic merit, even if that does mean forsaking that absolute photographic look.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ocelot99992003 In reply to AngstromAlliance [2012-09-13 12:01:00 +0000 UTC]
I understand. I've commissioned a few sculptures and I've also photographed weddings. Both are not quite the tempo I'm looking for when I imagine art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
proggy7 [2012-09-12 02:47:50 +0000 UTC]
Amazing that this can be accomplished in the vector world. Great job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tommyb709 [2012-09-12 02:16:12 +0000 UTC]
nicely done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>