HOME | DD

Description
Something stupid recently happened, enough for me to make this stamp.
After I've been a victim of libel, insults, personal attacks, and other major problems, I've been told by the special hate agenda against me that I'm the "problem", that I'm "no" victim, and so on. What's the excuse? Usually the term "criticism". They like to call EVERYTHING against me criticism, even down to personal attacks.
People also use this as an excuse to treat opinions as facts. Example part of the shit that happened to me was some asshole called TheDarkReindeer claiming that his views are "criticism" and not treating opinion as "facts". "criticism" and "opinions" can sometimes be used as if they were the same. If you call out an intentional effort animation such as wolves standing and wearing a mask as a "flaw" JUST because you don't like it while it was their intention, then by definition you ARE treating your views as facts regardless of how you put such label over it. Claiming someone's work (e.g. an effort alone within a main movie) that isn't yours as "flawed" and claiming your views are not biased is the same thing.

Now of course, I've heard that "criticism" is just an opinion. Quite honestly I don't fully agree.
Criticism is considered an important thing and has been used that if someone doesn't agree and defends, then the person is acting "bad" by not accepting criticism.
It's really hard to see that it's just "opinion" because many consider it to be "really important" and used it as serious arguments. So if opinions and criticism is the same, then that means "criticism" (as opinion) is "important" over other people's personal preferences (e.g. making a wolf stand and dance).

Criticism by definition is calling out flaws I think (I think might be opinion though, which I admit) and if so, then a flaw is and I quote:
"a mark, fault, or other imperfection that mars a substance or object."
An artist made a work, with his/her own style and part of it was an art style that the creator WANTED to put in to expand a loving audience for it. However, one person who was outside of the audience claimed that the style is "poor" or "bad" art style because it was "ugly" to the person. How exactly does you not liking a style make the other person's work "poor" or "bad"? Why are you saying it's a "mistake"? He didn't make the style for you!
Jesus, I don't know how much more I can explain this problem. But if you want to see a journal I've made involving how to give a fair critique and support creativity in fiction, then here:
another-realm.deviantart.com/j…

As for that rabid Alpha and Omega fan (TheDarkReindeer), he even does the whole victim blame thing that say: "Well if you post, expect people to "criticize"".
That's exactly like saying "Well, if you express yourself as a homosexual, expect people to "criticize."" even though it may not be criticism, his views can be compared to it under his special definition.
Besides, if he's going to use such a misleading term to get away with the claim that I somehow "started" drama with him on a post not mentioning him, then isn't he admitting that he STARTED it just by the review video having nothing to do with me then? -_-
He even acts like this stupid blaming consequence doesn't apply to him.
Also none of this drama would of happened if he didn't start it with me. He could of even made a video attempting (but failing) to criticize my points without a mention and I wouldn't consider it a start of drama.
Also warning: One of the most rabid fans who desired violence toward an artist and shown expression for writing the writer's name for the death note if it was real.

Sorry I been using this personal experience a lot. But here, I hope a lot of you are getting what I'm trying to say!
People has been making up these so-called "excuses" to get away causing a LOT of problems and this is one of the problems. Some may also make up tiny so-called excuses to get away abusing the dictionary (e.g. Saying that animation is "poor" even though it was directly an effort alone).
Also, it might sometimes be fine to try to criticize even if it's end up to something that may be wrong or something I don't agree but with a chance I could be wrong. Some people do that to me, but they are much more mature than the immature garbage I've experience.

Description
Something stupid recently happened, enough for me to make this stamp.
After I've been a victim of libel, insults, personal attacks, and other major problems, I've been told by the special hate agenda against me that I'm the "problem", that I'm "no" victim, and so on. What's the excuse? Usually the term "criticism". They like to call EVERYTHING against me criticism, even down to personal attacks.
People also use this as an excuse to treat opinions as facts. Example part of the shit that happened to me was some asshole called TheDarkReindeer claiming that his views are "criticism" and not treating opinion as "facts". "criticism" and "opinions" can sometimes be used as if they were the same. If you call out an intentional effort animation such as wolves standing and wearing a mask as a "flaw" JUST because you don't like it while it was their intention, then by definition you ARE treating your views as facts regardless of how you put such label over it. Claiming someone's work (e.g. an effort alone within a main movie) that isn't yours as "flawed" and claiming your views are not biased is the same thing.

Now of course, I've heard that "criticism" is just an opinion. Quite honestly I don't fully agree.
Criticism is considered an important thing and has been used that if someone doesn't agree and defends, then the person is acting "bad" by not accepting criticism.
It's really hard to see that it's just "opinion" because many consider it to be "really important" and used it as serious arguments. So if opinions and criticism is the same, then that means "criticism" (as opinion) is "important" over other people's personal preferences (e.g. making a wolf stand and dance).

Criticism by definition is calling out flaws I think (I think might be opinion though, which I admit) and if so, then a flaw is and I quote:
"a mark, fault, or other imperfection that mars a substance or object."
An artist made a work, with his/her own style and part of it was an art style that the creator WANTED to put in to expand a loving audience for it. However, one person who was outside of the audience claimed that the style is "poor" or "bad" art style because it was "ugly" to the person. How exactly does you not liking a style make the other person's work "poor" or "bad"? Why are you saying it's a "mistake"? He didn't make the style for you!
Jesus, I don't know how much more I can explain this problem. But if you want to see a journal I've made involving how to give a fair critique and support creativity in fiction, then here:
another-realm.deviantart.com/j…

As for that rabid Alpha and Omega fan (TheDarkReindeer), he even does the whole victim blame thing that say: "Well if you post, expect people to "criticize"".
That's exactly like saying "Well, if you express yourself as a homosexual, expect people to "criticize."" even though it may not be criticism, his views can be compared to it under his special definition.
Besides, if he's going to use such a misleading term to get away with the claim that I somehow "started" drama with him on a post not mentioning him, then isn't he admitting that he STARTED it just by the review video having nothing to do with me then? -_-
He even acts like this stupid blaming consequence doesn't apply to him.
Also none of this drama would of happened if he didn't start it with me. He could of even made a video attempting (but failing) to criticize my points without a mention and I wouldn't consider it a start of drama.
Also warning: One of the most rabid fans who desired violence toward an artist and shown expression for writing the writer's name for the death note if it was real.

Sorry I been using this personal experience a lot. But here, I hope a lot of you are getting what I'm trying to say!
People has been making up these so-called "excuses" to get away causing a LOT of problems and this is one of the problems. Some may also make up tiny so-called excuses to get away abusing the dictionary (e.g. Saying that animation is "poor" even though it was directly an effort alone).
Also, it might sometimes be fine to try to criticize even if it's end up to something that may be wrong or something I don't agree but with a chance I could be wrong. Some people do that to me, but they are much more mature than the immature garbage I've experience.