Comments: 29
ART-fromthe-HEART [2008-09-11 21:24:17 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful! The peacock is especially interesting - great detail! Looked like it took a very long time to make!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
str4yk1tt3n [2007-12-24 18:13:24 +0000 UTC]
lovely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
carolin54323 [2007-01-10 13:50:07 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful! I adore the detail on the peacock's feathers, and the fish, but it is all stunning. Is that copper leaf?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
carolin54323 In reply to arcticphoenixstudios [2007-01-11 11:08:07 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome. Cool. I didn't know you could get copper leaf. I know all forms of metalics allways look bad on scans (heh just look at the gold on my illuminations -hideous!), so what does the copper look like in real life? I expect it is much brighter...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
primulatook [2006-06-01 06:46:12 +0000 UTC]
This is a lovely work. Your detail is breathtaking!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
arcticphoenixstudios In reply to Aethelgar [2006-05-19 03:45:23 +0000 UTC]
*lol* Thanks! In reality, it's only about 60 or so hours of work with me working on the piece for 2-5 hours each sitting with 1-6 or 7 days in between depending on what else was going on at the time. That's how 3 months happens. I took up the project as a bit of a challenge. Before I graduated, one of my professors told me to try this....make one piece in 3 minutes and then do it again in 3 months and see what you get from it. It's an excercise in form, perspective, and detail. It's like learning figure drawing. You get the gesture of the piece out and then slowly work the form in, then the details. Many of the pieces I was making during that time were the black and gold sculptures I have on my page that took an average of 3-4 days from lump of clay to first firing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
BetulaNigra [2006-03-24 12:47:04 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful detail. It is easy to see why it took you so long. It is a delightful concept piece.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shuibhne [2006-03-21 06:10:38 +0000 UTC]
Holy hell, this is astounding!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ellygator [2006-03-19 14:53:59 +0000 UTC]
Simply gorgeous!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Funky-Ferret [2006-03-16 20:43:41 +0000 UTC]
HEY jade. I really dig it. i dunno what specific references you were making it to. but i do know that from what i'm learning of med. art, the peacock was an ancient roman symbol for everlasting life which got translated to being a symbol for christ! have a good day, and thank you. for the beautiful image. b'gok?
~yo
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
arcticphoenixstudios In reply to Funky-Ferret [2006-03-17 09:34:02 +0000 UTC]
Glad you enjoyed it. The peacock image has been used fairly extensively from the areas of India, where the species originated, to the Western world and has come to symbolize various things throughout history. See, it's funny that you mention the Christian correlation, though. One of the speculated ways it reached the Mediterranean as far as symbolism goes, was its association with Hera, wife of Zeus. The bird was her attributed sacred animal. Hera is supposedly mirrored in Egypt as Isis which pulls in a serpent attribution. I forget where and why it came from. Further eastward to the Iraq area, is the home of a religion that claims itself as ancient (pre-Muslim, thus, probably pre-Christian)and is probably one of the handful of surviving faiths that originally used the peacock as a symbol in its faith structure. The Yezidi people have their peacock angel. Essentially, Lucifer. Not Satan, mind you. The Morning Star. Sadam tried to take down these people, accusing them of being devil worshippers, which they aren't. Their Lucifer is a bit different than the Christian version, but still, it is interesting to hear the peacock being connected to Christ, ne? Such hypocrisy in this world.
"b'gok?" Eh? No chickens here
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
drakky [2006-03-11 00:53:07 +0000 UTC]
*GAPE*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0