HOME | DD

art0fCK — Nice girl

Published: 2016-08-31 08:39:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 95295; Favourites: 1987; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description artofck.photo@gmail.com
www.facebook.com/artofCk.photo
Related content
Comments: 34

dmessia [2020-04-12 11:12:14 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

phoinxalpha [2018-02-19 18:36:14 +0000 UTC]

wow beautifull !!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HammerinInkminer [2017-11-17 08:11:45 +0000 UTC]

...black -- the color wrap of anything and everything mysterious and sexy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

animefan11129 [2017-09-26 12:06:24 +0000 UTC]

would still though

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

animefan11129 [2017-09-26 12:06:10 +0000 UTC]

looks like my dad. hard pass.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KeithH1 [2017-01-30 19:32:58 +0000 UTC]

Amazing superb

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Yurigirl4eva [2017-01-01 14:57:35 +0000 UTC]

Omg 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sterling557 [2016-12-21 03:00:50 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful woman, Beautiful Picture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PierrelePoete [2016-10-20 15:14:32 +0000 UTC]

   absolutely gorgeous !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

n2n44 [2016-10-09 11:19:11 +0000 UTC]

beautiful picture

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kal-el4 [2016-09-25 06:34:31 +0000 UTC]

DAY-UMM!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WatchlikePlaton [2016-09-22 01:44:44 +0000 UTC]

dude thats not pretty, she needs healthy eating c.c and she's gonna have back pain her entire life <.<

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mecengineer [2016-09-09 10:46:07 +0000 UTC]

amazing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lammwould1 [2016-09-01 11:40:04 +0000 UTC]

You are going to have to submit your photos to Tastefully-Done. 

Thanks to D.A.'s new rules and settings- I can no longer request them. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BreloomsGarden [2016-09-01 04:22:41 +0000 UTC]

No thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KingChickenwing7 [2016-09-01 01:00:44 +0000 UTC]

Umm, how is this allowed without a mature rating? If you zoom in on the bottom part you can see her... ummm... parts.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BloodRedFullMoon In reply to KingChickenwing7 [2016-10-26 21:16:37 +0000 UTC]

So? They're covered. And it's not like you can actually see anything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingChickenwing7 In reply to BloodRedFullMoon [2016-11-19 16:12:16 +0000 UTC]

Nope, you can still see the shape and indent, it is just colored differently because of what she is wearing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BloodRedFullMoon In reply to KingChickenwing7 [2016-11-19 16:16:37 +0000 UTC]

doesn't matter. What does matter is that they're covered. Read the rules.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingChickenwing7 In reply to BloodRedFullMoon [2016-11-22 15:43:48 +0000 UTC]

Ok, that's really weird.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BloodRedFullMoon In reply to KingChickenwing7 [2016-11-22 16:39:03 +0000 UTC]

Why?
I never understood this typically american fear of nudity and sexuality.
Why is the sight of a naked human body so morally unacceptable to you guys? There is nothing more natural.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingChickenwing7 In reply to BloodRedFullMoon [2016-11-22 19:02:07 +0000 UTC]

True, but all humans sin. Unless you have something wrong with your body, if you are a man, then you will be attracted to a naked woman and want to do certain things with her. It would be very hard to be to loyal to your wife if tons of naked women were walking around everywhere.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BloodRedFullMoon In reply to KingChickenwing7 [2016-11-22 22:00:31 +0000 UTC]

There is no such thing as sin, but exactly this mindset probably explains america's sickening prudishness.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with being attracted to women (naked or clothed makes no difference to me, personally).
Being loyal to one's partner is a matter of simple will or decency tho, if you can't even be bothered to make a small,
conscious effort to stay above your basest instincts, chances are you're not relationship material. It's not someone else's responsibility to make sure you don't get horny, tho.

That aside, nobody is talking about naked women walking around everywhere (although personally I wouldn't mind). I was merely talking about a more healthy view of nudeness and sexuality - and no, religious morality is certainly anything but that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KingChickenwing7 In reply to BloodRedFullMoon [2016-11-24 19:45:31 +0000 UTC]

Ok, I am done with reasoning with you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BloodRedFullMoon In reply to KingChickenwing7 [2016-11-26 20:44:06 +0000 UTC]

You haven't been reasoning in the first place.

It seems to me that you're shittalking pictures that for whatever unfathomable reason offend your skewed sense of religious morality.
I have a simple suggestion to you: Don't like it? Don't look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

evantulacmaster [2016-08-31 22:49:48 +0000 UTC]

beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

n-l-e [2016-08-31 21:04:13 +0000 UTC]

very nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chazzier [2016-08-31 19:36:54 +0000 UTC]

Nice glamour shot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AkiraSpectrum [2016-08-31 19:29:39 +0000 UTC]

phenomenal shot

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

2dresq [2016-08-31 18:33:54 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful pose and capture.  Great job to you and the model.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jleon323 [2016-08-31 16:58:46 +0000 UTC]

She is a very beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GioRgSaVv [2016-08-31 13:36:42 +0000 UTC]

faptain?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kongvmax [2016-08-31 13:35:39 +0000 UTC]

lushious

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fxx85 [2016-08-31 08:44:42 +0000 UTC]

Very nice photo and girl indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0