Comments: 56
livingcomforteagle [2007-03-21 00:17:53 +0000 UTC]
appealing to the eye.
lovely job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gromyko [2007-02-27 03:57:29 +0000 UTC]
lovely
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EBelacqua [2006-07-06 13:41:10 +0000 UTC]
i love how busy this is
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CaptPunk [2006-07-01 10:24:54 +0000 UTC]
lovely job
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
arterie In reply to Lilyas [2006-04-16 01:07:16 +0000 UTC]
Hey, thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
brek3 [2005-01-08 18:57:06 +0000 UTC]
love the complex composition.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bleedingmirror [2004-12-13 21:17:15 +0000 UTC]
I know what it is! A stereo being attacked by tye-dye packing peanuts!
No, probably not, but I still love it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pr0jectz [2004-11-27 18:20:10 +0000 UTC]
One of the coolest works yet, well done sir.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jark [2004-08-24 08:46:11 +0000 UTC]
love all the colors and fluid shapes and those alien artifact-like things being present in this piece made my day!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
justthorne [2004-08-18 21:34:24 +0000 UTC]
Pardon if this amounts to nearly "two comments in one," but there've been two in a row from you now that kick my ass. I had a DAMN hard time choosing which to fave, because I like them both for the same underlying reason, but this one got the slight edge for me.
The "underlying" reason is that I don't think I've ever seen your designs overflow so profoundly with their emotional "story" as these two. In fact, Celebration would do so even more blatantly. But if your art boils down in a nutshell to brillant mixture of abstraction and design genius, then these two seem to me to take the mixture to a new level. One simply cannot help but emotionally, as well as visually, participate in these images. It's not that this resulting effect is new, but rather that I don't think I've seen it so powerfully from you before.
By this standard, Celebration is perhaps more wildly successful - it's overwhelming from first glance, an invitation to sing along, and amazingly kinetic. That such merriment could be communicated so clearly and unambiguously, and yet with such "unfamiliar" cues (rather than, say, party hats), rather astounds me.
But it's this piece that's the "mesmerpiece." It reminds me of aspects of both Jim Woodring's and ^ ndifference 's art that I love, the fabulous illusions of depth, relief, and contours. But perhaps exactly because it's not so crowded, that there IS so much negative space, each element can be more sweetly savored and explored, both for their own sakes but then also as relative parts of the whole.
(That strange form in the box, center, really gets me too - I finally figured out that he reminds me of Opus.)
I really like that you blurred some elements "back," and I'd encourage you to play more with this in future pieces. I'd be interested to see what you could do with implied planes (whole or made of objects) at skewed angles from the basic x/y/z axes, mixed in among other floating elements, and using the gradiated blur effects that could enhance that direction (no pun intended).
But the fundamental appeal of this one is rock-solid, and even a little more amazing to me than Celebration. In that piece, you married a hugely-abstracted visual image to a pretty concrete concept, and entirely pulled it off. But in this piece, you manifest a concept that's much more ambiguous, and still entirely pull off the correlation.
Is this a magic show? Yes, absolutely, undeniably. But what IS magic, or a magic show? But what IS this image? Those questions (or those answers) simply do not matter, because it's the correlation itself that's done so well and true here. You have captured a spirit, and it stuns me how well.
We gaze in wonder.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
arterie In reply to justthorne [2004-08-19 05:16:58 +0000 UTC]
Thorne I can't thank you enough, and I'm still savoring your words and am humbled. Your suggestions for the depth of field is a wonderful one, and will give that a try. ~ you know I love combing photos with my hand drawn objects. The fact they also have that depth of blurry background and sharp foreground is what I like and it'll be interesting to see what I can come up with. ~ thanks again, . . . !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
noir [2004-08-18 01:43:54 +0000 UTC]
this is way too much fun!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
noir In reply to arterie [2004-08-20 17:39:05 +0000 UTC]
i made it over for the last hour - lol. i was kinda disappointed - it was so small...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
arterie In reply to noir [2004-08-21 20:16:41 +0000 UTC]
yeah, it seemed like a blow-out if you weren't registered to any classes, and you know, in looking back, most of that info we can get online, it's just knowing where to look.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Deborah-Valentine [2004-08-14 11:01:20 +0000 UTC]
i love how all the shapes interact with one another, but my most favorite part is the dandelion leaves! the bitter greens are always healing to the body! your work is so pretty!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zlatty [2004-08-14 01:43:28 +0000 UTC]
man this is just wild
its not like anything else i have seen
truly fantastic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hbynoe [2004-08-13 23:56:13 +0000 UTC]
holy shit
that is beautiful
and chaotic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hbynoe In reply to arterie [2004-08-14 07:01:14 +0000 UTC]
well i would have been close
if i was still there
i am back in NYC
nothing much at home though
no damage
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>