Comments: 20
Chiminix [2014-04-10 20:46:20 +0000 UTC]
Got disproof?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BTIsaac [2012-02-12 01:24:29 +0000 UTC]
Never felt I need any proof for something that's evident, but yes, I do for the matter of fact. You're probably not interested though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kabya19 [2011-03-29 21:37:48 +0000 UTC]
Nope, not a bit. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
arel-be [2008-02-26 21:23:48 +0000 UTC]
do you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kabya19 In reply to Boverisuchus [2011-03-29 21:37:20 +0000 UTC]
How is any less mature than the stamp?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boverisuchus In reply to kabya19 [2011-03-30 05:39:49 +0000 UTC]
because Christians assume that the scientific method is just "guessing", which is the ultimate in stupidity.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kabya19 In reply to Boverisuchus [2011-04-01 10:33:29 +0000 UTC]
...No...We just come to the conclusion that even though no one can actually prove the existance of god, no-one can disprove it. We don't think you're guessing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boverisuchus In reply to kabya19 [2011-04-01 11:46:34 +0000 UTC]
The existence of god does not hinge on science being right or not. Science is as close as man can get to truths about the universe. Eternal questions and unknowable truths, such as god, mysticism, spirits, magic abilities, are beyond the scope of science.
I personally think that if god exists, we most likely haven't the faintest idea about him/her. We mere puny mortals can no more know god than a bacterium can know a black hole.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kabya19 In reply to Boverisuchus [2011-04-01 11:54:01 +0000 UTC]
...Very well put. And I completely agree. I have no idea what god is, who god is or even if he exists, I just believe he does. And if what you believe makes you happy, it really doesn't matter that science can't prove it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boverisuchus In reply to kabya19 [2011-04-01 12:29:45 +0000 UTC]
By the same token, choosing to believe in what is provable, as opposed to faith-based thinking, should neither be frowned upon, or called a religion.
Raised as a catholic, I like to think God is out there, and that Jesus was real. However, I am agnostic, and remain skeptical of the bible being regarded as truth. Jesus is confirmed by historical evidence other than the bible. But his mystical powers and connection to the divine I regard with extreme skepticism, but even if he is not the son of god, I can still view him as an exemplary moral figure, who died in a very unfair way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jessii333 [2007-07-05 03:11:22 +0000 UTC]
can I join your club please!? ^^ I'm pretty much atheist... I have mixed about religions
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
camelhijackation [2007-02-28 22:40:46 +0000 UTC]
It's funny because what this club promotes, also lacks "proof" Any follower of atheism who sports this stamp is supporting a double standard and a logical fallacy.
Oh how droll.
To expanding a notion already mentioned, true proof only exists within mathematics.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
camelhijackation In reply to Lyn-Zo [2007-09-05 21:45:08 +0000 UTC]
There are no proofs for atheistic, agnostic, or spiritual beliefs concerning God and other certain "supernatural" events. All are leaps of faith which don't have the logical ground to support them.
So "Got proof" is moot, almost silly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dresdenblue In reply to camelhijackation [2007-10-03 23:25:04 +0000 UTC]
...I believe the point is that there's no proof for God, and so you exist in a state of doubt, uncertainty. Agnosticism. Most "certain" atheism is derived almost as... taking the limit, to use a math metaphor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thequantumwarrior [2007-01-11 21:28:23 +0000 UTC]
I do, but only in the mathmtaical sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0