Comments: 7
Wetsobem [2008-09-16 05:11:55 +0000 UTC]
Indeed...and what was it about this that initially made you self-conscious? Assuming that this is accurate (head and hands aside), you look phenomenal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wetsobem In reply to athousandstoriesshy [2008-09-17 04:00:54 +0000 UTC]
Understandable; I had the same sort of environment (albeit having a different affect on me than you). It is good, though, that you are comfortable with yourself and understand the many facets of body-composition, which are often overlooked and undervalued. You really should be proud of yourself, though, because I find it hard to believe that many people would find much of anything to object to from any stand-point.
If you understand my meaning, you are somewhat of an oddity in this community: you take the idea that forms the basis of our literary genre from an almost purely analogous standpoint; how it applies psychologically. That isn't a bad thing, quite to the contrary. Normally, you see a very one-sided bias skewed by sexuality that isn't present in what you write. Kudos.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wetsobem In reply to athousandstoriesshy [2008-09-20 00:07:19 +0000 UTC]
Yes, it makes sense. Honestly, I would prefer to see nothing in artwork but the very best impression of the subject that the artist can render. By that, I do not mean an exact likeness, far from it. I would prefer a better likeness, one which does not show the flaws of the subject but which depicts the perfect abstraction which seeing the real subject stimulates. In a still-life, not a bowl of fruit, but the concept of a bowl of fruit; the perfect bowl of fruit. I would love to see self portraits done in that fashion: not lies, not touch-ups, but ideals--self-esteem in oils.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pandorapandora [2008-09-15 21:55:31 +0000 UTC]
Hey, that's that bathing suit I never wore and gave to you! Looks fantastic on you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1