Comments: 24
Elitehunter347 [2019-02-15 20:37:32 +0000 UTC]
I AM INTRIGUED
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Hillygon [2018-07-27 06:44:38 +0000 UTC]
Looks like Velmaโs flabby & soft body is weighing her down to immobility. In a lovely & romantic way.
๐: 1 โฉ: 0
Epson2000-2008 [2018-03-02 22:00:59 +0000 UTC]
It looks great to me.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Thickstick22 [2016-09-10 04:08:27 +0000 UTC]
Zoinks! And jinkies
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
thatguy0365 [2016-09-09 22:13:44 +0000 UTC]
I recommend putting a mature content tag on what I assume is your fetish art. No ill intentions.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
kiesu In reply to thatguy0365 [2016-09-09 22:23:57 +0000 UTC]
You might want to look up definition of "mature content" before posting such suggestion...
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
thatguy0365 In reply to kiesu [2016-09-09 23:40:53 +0000 UTC]
Well, I know it includes sexual content. And if I'm correct to believe this is fetish art, that would mean people touch themselves to it. Hence making it fall under the definition of mature content.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
kiesu In reply to thatguy0365 [2016-09-10 11:09:54 +0000 UTC]
Some people find temselves sexually attracted to cars (no i'm not joking), that doesnt mean we need to put mature tag on pictures of cars because 0.001% of the population look at them "that way". You mature tag pieces with actual mature content on them, this one has none.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
thatguy0365 In reply to kiesu [2016-09-10 11:15:54 +0000 UTC]
Alright, fine. If that's what you think, I suppose I won't be able to change your mind.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
kiesu In reply to thatguy0365 [2016-09-10 20:57:34 +0000 UTC]
I'd just telling you the definition of Mature Content since you didnt look it up yourself..
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
thatguy0365 In reply to kiesu [2016-09-10 22:05:34 +0000 UTC]
Um, I did in fact look it up. One of the things that was there was sexual content. Meaning something you jack off to. Hence why I asked for the filter.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
thatguy0365 In reply to kiesu [2016-09-11 00:58:18 +0000 UTC]
It would still count as sexual themes, but I see that I won't get to you any time soon. So forget it, I suppose.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
thatguy0365 In reply to kiesu [2016-09-11 18:29:46 +0000 UTC]
Well, if it's treated as fetish art, and I am able to tell that it is, I suppose I could attempt to. I wouldn't, however, if it isn't intended to be fetish art. Good luck with adding nothing new to the website, by the way.
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
thatguy0365 In reply to kiesu [2016-09-12 17:58:10 +0000 UTC]
Well, I am interested in proving you wrong, but I see we simply have different interpretations of what falls under it's category. So yeah, I suppose arguing further will get neither of us anywhere.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
thatguy0365 In reply to kiesu [2016-09-13 18:16:23 +0000 UTC]
Fair enough. Thanks for being calm and intelligent about this. Most people usually respond to me with "kys".
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
barney-nedward In reply to thatguy0365 [2016-09-11 23:22:48 +0000 UTC]
If you don't like looking at fat people just don't click on the links to these pics.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
blakeythegreat In reply to thatguy0365 [2016-09-10 00:58:12 +0000 UTC]
People touch them selves to pictures of cars everything is fetish art if you want it hard enough.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
thatguy0365 In reply to blakeythegreat [2016-09-10 02:21:34 +0000 UTC]
True, but this is a very common fetish. A large majority of people who have fetishes have this one.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0