HOME | DD

bailey--elizabeth In reply to booflesnazzer [2011-07-07 05:46:07 +0000 UTC]

well according to that fine sir up there i have the expression of "an ugly ass emo who enjoys bleeding constantly cause she has no life outside a dark closet and a butter knife." so...

hahha. oh, trolls.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

booflesnazzer In reply to bailey--elizabeth [2011-07-10 00:11:27 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I saw that dumb shit. Too bad I don't know where it lives. I would try to find out, but there are too many bridges to search under.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Randygonzales In reply to booflesnazzer [2011-07-16 13:52:36 +0000 UTC]

Actual that comment is not 100% trolling

this image is really cliched and over done and overall just not effective

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

booflesnazzer In reply to Randygonzales [2011-07-19 06:02:17 +0000 UTC]

There is a very clear difference between your critique and the series of posts by AwesomeMan1675 on this deviation. There is no "discussion" when someone says that a piece of art should be "killed with fire" and then labels an entire group of people and subsequently claims that they are all "garbage". On the internet, we refer to a series of vehement, overly negative posts by the same user on a single thread/deviation/etc as "trolling". It's fine to have your own taste in art, like the way some people would consider a crucifix submerged in urine art based on its commentary on the cheapening of religion in the modern era, while some would judge it based solely on its visual presentation which isn't necessarily anything special--they might be missing the point by not fully engaging the piece, but to each his own. However, it is another thing entirely to make irrelevant comments about your own perception of the artist's lifestyle and essentially shout prejudicial remarks in an open forum where you re expected to present a respectful critique--either positive or negative--on the piece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Randygonzales In reply to booflesnazzer [2011-07-19 10:01:46 +0000 UTC]

Don't compare unoriginal amatuer emo (so dark and edgy nose bleed)photography to Andres Serrano. Idiot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

booflesnazzer In reply to Randygonzales [2011-07-20 04:03:45 +0000 UTC]

You mean "let's call out Christianity because that's something fresh and original" Andres Serrano? (so dark and edgy piss on a crucifix) Or maybe you mean "let's do something that finally brings attention to the lack of genuine spiritual conviction in the cold, hyper-rational modern age" Andres Serrano? You see there are two main ways to look at that picture you like. And two ways to look at that one you don't. You find your reasons to dislike it, or you find your reasons to support it. Either way, however, you're applying meaning (either your own or maybe someone else's) to something that has no inherent meaning by virtue of its being created, therefore nothing is right.

Negative feedback is fine. Positive feedback is fine. Discourse is great, and healthy for any society. Trolling/flame-baiting is a drain of energy on all parties involved. This is my one attempt at a proactive approach to remedying an unhealthy form of debate.

My intention is to establish an objective context. Anything beyond that is a waste of my time, so, with respect, if conversation about this particular photograph is going to continue in an unhealthy way (by either supporters or detractors), then I have no reason to remain a part of it.

Say your piece and move on. Realize that there is an existence and an experience outside of your own.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Randygonzales In reply to booflesnazzer [2011-07-20 11:26:05 +0000 UTC]

You wasted your time writing that.

Don't compare unoriginal amatuer emo (so dark and edgy nose bleed)photography to Andres Serrano. Idiot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bailey--elizabeth In reply to AwesomeMan1675 [2011-07-07 05:46:31 +0000 UTC]

how many times are you going to comment on this?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SpiderSnyder In reply to AwesomeMan1675 [2011-07-02 01:10:40 +0000 UTC]

You're very narrow minded. It's not an "emo". It's a photo displaying sorrow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Wolvesmaycry In reply to AwesomeMan1675 [2011-07-01 18:47:25 +0000 UTC]

stfu you Troll

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SiKurkSu In reply to AwesomeMan1675 [2011-07-01 18:12:17 +0000 UTC]

Wow, you're a close minded person. If you don't like it don't look at it and change click to a different page more suited to your tastes. This is a lovely artistic shot and displays a deep emotion/event.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Randygonzales In reply to SiKurkSu [2011-07-16 13:54:57 +0000 UTC]

Close minded people don't look at thing they don't like.
you are close minded person
whose is trying shut down discussion.

This shot is not artisitc it is an overdone emo ineffective shot that just about about every "dark" ametuer photographer has on their page, and this is not bias I like some of this photographers work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SiKurkSu In reply to Randygonzales [2011-07-17 05:51:08 +0000 UTC]

Art is where you find it. And everyone is close minded in one way or another, there is no way to keep a completely open frame of mind. She found a way to express something and wouldn't have uploaded it if she didn't enjoy the piece. It IS artistic through light, shot, angle, concept etc. original. Everyone is amateur because we never stop learning.

Btw how is saying "stfu you troll" an opening to a discussion?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Randygonzales In reply to SiKurkSu [2011-07-17 10:20:46 +0000 UTC]

"It IS artistic through light, shot, angle, concept etc. original."
Yeah repeating yourself doesn't make it true.
please it is a fucking generic nose bleed shot just about every emo photographer has on the page, how is it original?
OH WOW SO DARK AND EDGY, please

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bailey--elizabeth In reply to ElephantHands [2011-07-01 03:42:50 +0000 UTC]

thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0