HOME | DD

BarryKiddPhotography In reply to vargihate [2009-05-05 16:44:21 +0000 UTC]

It was a pro stock shot that I got from photospin.com Bacicly you have to pay for it.

I still have it on file here since I keep all stock files I have paid for but can't send it due to copyright infringement.

I also just made a search on photospin and cant find it.

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

vargihate In reply to BarryKiddPhotography [2009-05-06 08:35:10 +0000 UTC]

that's ok friend, thanks for the reply anyway.
and thanks for providing me with the link. that site looks good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BarryKiddPhotography In reply to MiraKHall [2005-07-25 00:08:37 +0000 UTC]

I can't say.

I am an After Effects Virgin but I do hear that you can animate Phtoshop layers in Afer Effects. It would be cool to watch the water layer float down and from the sky in this image and rest into place ontop of the black layer.

Have a great day and thank you for the comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MiraKHall In reply to BarryKiddPhotography [2005-07-25 00:15:47 +0000 UTC]

I'll ask my instructor if it's possible; AE and PS are almost related to each other in manipulation techniques, especially with the layer effects and filters (it just involves a lot of animation as well, from simple steps to anal retentiveness involved with detail, which I possess, I'm sure )

And yeah, you can animate Photoshop images in After Effects, but they need to be in separate layers, and any layer effects you apply you want to keep, you gotta 'flatten' it (or 'rosterize', if that's thr right word) before importing into the composition.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BarryKiddPhotography In reply to VideoBeetle [2005-07-25 01:07:51 +0000 UTC]

Thank for the comment. As I have already said however i am not so sure that I like it. Perhaps I muttered about to much or it didn't make since to someone on the outside as to why were were doing some of the steps we were doing. Ya know?

Anyway thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VideoBeetle In reply to BarryKiddPhotography [2005-07-25 02:01:56 +0000 UTC]

I will admit, it was a little lengthy for a tutorial. However if I was to show this to some of the artists around here learning Photoshop and Gimp, I do not think they would have too much trouble following it. It seemed to me that you explained the steps enough for someone to understand (or maybe that's just because I knew what you were doing whereas someone unfamiliar with this may not understand) Anyway, I still feel it is a good tutorial, and if anyone asks me how to do a glass effect sometime I will keep this tutorial in mind.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BarryKiddPhotography In reply to ZODC [2005-07-25 00:23:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much for the comment but in truth I don't feel so awsome. I have wanted to show this technique on video for a long time but I could never get the file size small enough.

Now that I have been able to I am glad to post it but it is not my best effort at making a tutorial by any means.

Thank you for the comment and please have a great day,

Barry

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BarryKiddPhotography In reply to arctic-ex [2005-07-25 00:24:46 +0000 UTC]

Yep. It has its uses but can be . Over done or over used as well. Ya know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

arctic-ex In reply to BarryKiddPhotography [2005-07-26 05:18:02 +0000 UTC]

Meh I am a artist, all I need is my imagination

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BarryKiddPhotography In reply to BarryKiddPhotography [2005-07-25 00:32:34 +0000 UTC]

That should read it "can be over done or over used as well."

👍: 0 ⏩: 0