HOME | DD
BASELARDER — T Rex
#anthro #dinosaur #female #furry #reptile #scalie #theropod #trex #tyrannosaur #tyrannosaurus #tyrannosaurusrex
Published: 2018-11-05 05:06:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 4451; Favourites: 60; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
cranked this lady out before bedtime. turned out better than expectedRelated content
Comments: 9
Like the sense of action, the grainy texture and how you included a bit of downy crest - sometimes you actually can please everybody! - but still got to ask something you have already heard. Or at least a variation of it.
Do those breasts produce yolk?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thank you! I like to put bristles and down on my t rexes :3 Pleasing everybody is pretty hard(especially with dinosaur art some people are rly picky about dinosaurs) lol glad i've achieved it
And as for the breasts, they're aesthetic. When it comes to most of my anthro characters, im not really concerned with their biology or internal comparative anatomy between them and humans. So wether or not they produce yolk is an unanswered, mysterious question that I'll let everyone decide what answer they'd like to hear. I've actually never had anyone ask me that question, believe it or not(surprising considering how many big titty dinosaurs i draw)
if i was writing a fantasy race, id think more about that, but right now ive been in a "slice of life" mood where i pretty much just shove anthros where humans should be :0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I like your reasoning. You call yours "slice of life", I call mine "frozen in time" - not entirely similar reasoning, but certainly good neighbours.
Am very surprised to hear nobody has asked this before, though. I rarely work with scalies, so never given their biology a lot of thought. It just struck out of nowhere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No problem! questions are always welcome and im sure there are scale-focused artists out there who have some explanation for reptilian knockers
drawing anatomical parallels between other mammals and humans is certainly more straightforward than with non mammal animals.
I love physically anthropomorphizing animals like fish, reptiles, birds, arthropods and when i do so i generally disregard any sense of realism(aquatic creatures on land, number of limbs, vestigial wings[or lack therof], and again, breasts). and even though, anatomically, they make no sense, I still enjoy the aesthetic and variety.
I do find the different ways different artists [including myself] choose to combine or alter human/animal anatomy to design their characters absolutely fascinating. Ive noticed some people dislike anatomically implausible ideas, Or anthro media or stories that doesn't NEED anthro characters, and could easily be replaced with humans[which is totally fine, just a personal preference on their or my part. And i totally appreciate well written lore surround anthropomorphism].
i personally really like anthro media that has no explanation, biological grounding or lore surrounding the different animals portrayed[maybe aside from animal related jokes and puns].
Not entirely related to the topic at hand, but just thought i had on my mind :0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ya know, there's just somethin' wrong about a T-Rex with boobs ...
Maybe a T-Rachel?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
If I do not remember wrong, the canonical name of the elder Jurassic Park T-Rex is "Roberta".
Presumably just to mess with the game warden's head.
T-Rexes go well with names that begin with an 'r'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Haha Rachel is a good name :0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Actually, I just remembered- That concept was used in "Ice Age, Dawn of the Dinosaurs." Buck the weasel bragged about his knife, and how he used it to turn a T-Rex into a T-Rachel.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1