Comments: 7
ElSqiubbonator [2018-11-07 05:11:44 +0000 UTC]
I like how you gave it a rounded snout (the idea of megalodon having a pointed snout is based on the idea it was related to the great white shark, which it was not), but I have to take issue with the barnacles. Sharks don't get barnacles. That's the entire reason their skin is so rough-- it stops barnacles from sticking to them and causing drag.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SammyDrawsStuff In reply to ElSqiubbonator [2019-09-07 00:11:29 +0000 UTC]
Almost all sharks have pointed snouts. Carcharocles/Otodus megalodon wouldn't be any different than any other lamnid. No other shark with a niche like that of Carcharocles/Otodus megalodon has a snout that is THAT rounded. "But a rounded snout would've helped it eat whales!" I hear you say. Well, Carcharocles/Otodus megalodon didn't live with large baleen whales. It would've mostly fed off of the small to medium sized baleen whales and other sharks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Timurlengia [2018-05-07 23:00:51 +0000 UTC]
Really good! Although two things he didn't do his research on.
1. Sharks can't hang barnacles stick yo their skin. Plus we have no evidence of this.
2. Using the Null Hypothesis, they wouldn't have a round face. This is because when we use phylogeny (which is very unreliable but helpful in this case) they would have a pointed nose. Like a Mako Shark does. Accept probably not that pointed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
acepredator [2018-04-30 01:14:42 +0000 UTC]
Why a blunt snout? Even outside lamnids, most Lamniformes sharks have pointed snouts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0