Comments: 28
laresistance [2008-04-22 04:15:35 +0000 UTC]
masterpiece
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ambird [2007-09-17 15:48:49 +0000 UTC]
wow ben, you never cease to amaze me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BenjaminCee In reply to ambird [2007-09-19 03:09:01 +0000 UTC]
let's all make a crazy pact to
never cease to 'be'!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ambird In reply to BenjaminCee [2007-09-19 03:39:33 +0000 UTC]
alright, i solemnly swear
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ajd [2007-09-17 15:35:48 +0000 UTC]
Top 10 illustrators of the year, here we come.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jawa-Tron [2007-09-17 13:25:47 +0000 UTC]
draw it in wine then eats its.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Neskato [2007-09-17 12:38:51 +0000 UTC]
YOUR LOGIC IS SUPERB.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
viridian-storm [2007-09-17 11:11:17 +0000 UTC]
Mm, tasty piece.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shaunC [2007-09-17 10:15:47 +0000 UTC]
How did you get the shades without resorting to the computer?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BenjaminCee In reply to shaunC [2007-09-17 10:20:30 +0000 UTC]
oh, i resorted... but all the effort, the planning, the pain was in the pencils then brush and ink, so i call this traditional...is that what you mean?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
shaunC In reply to BenjaminCee [2007-09-17 10:39:44 +0000 UTC]
Yeah.
As a matter of fact, I am starting to use the computer for colouring (Which is I admit going against what I stood for by keeping the computer away from my art in progress) just to have a go, 'be not afraid' so to speak.
But I haven't abandoned the water colour pencils...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Themrock [2007-09-17 10:11:12 +0000 UTC]
It's the truth...you are the better inker.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ShirtTurtle [2007-09-17 10:09:09 +0000 UTC]
You sure this isn't digital?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BenjaminCee In reply to ShirtTurtle [2007-09-17 10:21:27 +0000 UTC]
i drew this with a paintbrush dipped in ink, planned out with pencils first --- the greys took little time.
you think i should call it digital?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
BenjaminCee In reply to ShirtTurtle [2007-09-18 03:19:15 +0000 UTC]
i didnt see an option for mixed media....hm...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ShirtTurtle In reply to BenjaminCee [2007-09-18 10:37:10 +0000 UTC]
maybe they took it out.
I used to see it all the time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mazzdad In reply to BenjaminCee [2007-09-17 14:53:55 +0000 UTC]
awesome piece.
i dont think you should call it digital unless it is *primarily* a digital piece.
this piece certainly does not fit that description, as a great deal of the work involved is done with traditional media.
The drawing itself could easily stand alone, without the coloring.
So the digital coloring only aids the traditional media, not the other way around.
Also----it would help if DeviantArt would adjust the categories a little
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BenjaminCee In reply to mazzdad [2007-09-18 12:01:33 +0000 UTC]
thanks mike---yesyes you a correct!!
i've had mind battles about this junk.
i'm sure the original unaltered thing is dominant here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
redgoat [2007-09-17 09:42:08 +0000 UTC]
Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way.
It does with pickled acorns though. Weird.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BenjaminCee In reply to redgoat [2007-09-17 09:44:57 +0000 UTC]
only seems to work with ciggarettes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
redgoat In reply to BenjaminCee [2007-09-17 09:57:37 +0000 UTC]
Draw a cigarette on a cigarette paper and then roll it up and smoke it. It would be like, an ultimate smoke.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Random-Mind [2007-09-17 09:38:29 +0000 UTC]
Woww.
[:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0