HOME | DD

bexe — Civilization

Published: 2008-02-18 06:07:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 2739; Favourites: 57; Downloads: 81
Redirect to original
Description Reworking old images...
Denver, Feb. 2007
Related content
Comments: 14

gabrielenaia [2008-08-13 12:37:27 +0000 UTC]

great shot! it is not so common on here to find people which photographs with some ideas and purposes in the mind... most of the stuff seems to be born by chance.

anyway, i like it very much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pename [2008-05-20 18:22:09 +0000 UTC]

i like the spitting. enphasises the sense (to me) that this is a monstrosity, an abomination. It's just such a damn ugly thing.

good work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hellblazer [2008-04-01 14:48:19 +0000 UTC]

looks like a big old steam boat!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JTF-5128 [2008-02-19 04:06:17 +0000 UTC]

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

phonet [2008-02-19 02:57:32 +0000 UTC]

Those birds make it magical. If that makes any sense to you at all...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

p0rtishead [2008-02-18 19:29:26 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EXtrasoda [2008-02-18 16:23:31 +0000 UTC]

wow)))
very beautiful!!
i want to be here!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alivein85 [2008-02-18 12:50:15 +0000 UTC]

'Dig it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BBCVersus [2008-02-18 11:04:17 +0000 UTC]

Awesome!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

entwined-vines [2008-02-18 10:07:29 +0000 UTC]

Very nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

spincus [2008-02-18 07:28:19 +0000 UTC]

ok i have to ask this, why are so many folks trying to play with multiframes inside one shot? I am seeing it everywhere.

if a shot is boring in one frame, does putting in two frames make it less boring?

I think your shot is interesting, i think you created more drama or really curiosity, by doing what you did. But i am trying to understand the artistic reasoning. The curiosity is not long lived how ever. I do not think i will walk away latter and think, now that was an incredible photo.

Strangely i like the style, especially the tonal changes. I think i would not make it as much a mirror though. i would break the lines more on the left. I would break the mirror logic more is what i am saying. Abstract it more on the left.

Maybe if i understood the why i would not be saying this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bexe In reply to spincus [2008-02-19 00:44:22 +0000 UTC]

The answer is really very basic: it's aesthetically pleasing to my eyes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

spincus In reply to bexe [2008-02-19 04:15:40 +0000 UTC]

well that makes a ton of sense hehe

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MStout [2008-02-18 06:12:36 +0000 UTC]

Nice...this is really dandy to look at.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0