HOME | DD

billy2345 — T-26-33 Armored

Published: 2019-03-05 15:37:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 1952; Favourites: 32; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description     Ah, yes, the T-26. This tank is a lot like the Panzer 1 for Germany. Important for training crews and manufacturing, but very poor on the field. The tank was based upon the popular Vickers export tanks, The Vicker mark E, The Vickers 6 ton, in 1931, it was the most modern design around, and Russia with it's large fleet of first world war dinosaurs and ancient T-18s, felt it necessary to buy a few. They got about 15 of them and as Vickers built them, the soviet engineers came and watched them very closely. by 1932, Russia was ready with it's own domestic versions.

    Let's skip to the interesting bit because from 1931 to 1939 there were a few changes to the basic formula. Right outta the gate of WW2 the T-26 was in the company it's little brothers, the BT-5s and BT-7s, it's bigger brothers, the T-28, the T-35, the KV-1, and kinda sorta the T-34. Great! However, most these tanks were missing a key component that would had paid dividends...Radios! All German tanks had radios, only a few Soviet tanks had radios, most had flags. Oh yeah, I can't imagine how that can go wrong. Long story short, HUGE amounts of Russian tanks are smashed to bits, the red air force was blown into the weeds and hundreds of thousands of soldiers were captured.

    But a few Russian tanks tried to help themselves, most famously, slapping even more armor onto the tanks, the T-28s, KV-1s, and the T-26s bolted on even more armor to improve their chances. In hind sight, the major thing that was killing them wasn't ground fire, it was artillery and air attack, and a little more armor can't really help you if your a little T-26 which can get your roof knocked in by just about any German tank that cares to shoot at you.

    Even with added armor, one by one the T-26s fall along with the T-28, the T-35s, even the BT tanks all are claimed by the relentless German advance. Only the KVs and the T-34s would live on to halt the German march and force them back to Germany.

    The T-26, just like it's Polish cousin, the 7TP, was a tank from a rather modern source. And the idea was there, the T-26 and its kin were built with combined arms in mind, men and tanks working together with artillery and ground attack planes. In the 30s, this tank would have been alright. Not great, German and Russia had T-34s and Panzer 4s respectably, the T-26 was just a gap filler tank, a practice for industry to do something in peace time.

    So yeah, the Panzer 1 and the T-26 have a lot more in common then at first glance. They both were mostly used to gear up their nations production capacity for serious production later on. Once the war starts the PZ 1 was pushed off the battlefield as soon as the war got hairy, relegated to rear line service. But not the T-26, The T-26 fought and fought, and didn't pull off the front line...Well, when they weren't being blown up, or breaking down, or getting lost, or getting captured...Yeah.
Related content
Comments: 6

Severity-Gray [2019-03-06 10:17:32 +0000 UTC]

I can even add that the hight military comman of the USSR dismissed the tank divisions in 1937, as they fought that there will be no war with the Third Reich. Stalin believed in Molotov-Ribbentropp pact and just sat at his ass flat. Stalin even purged a half of hight and middle command, looking for traitors, but anyway, russians was the biggest collaboration groups. And yes, our tanks was burning like a coal, exepting T-34 and KV-1/KV-2. Also, lots of machines was lost in cause of supplies lack. 
Good work, Billy!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dekra234 [2019-03-06 06:05:52 +0000 UTC]

^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Generalender15 [2019-03-05 16:34:24 +0000 UTC]

Nice tank

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

eltf177 [2019-03-05 16:15:47 +0000 UTC]

The T-26 did sterling service in Spain where it overwhelmed both the Panzer I and Italian CV33 tankettes. It was better than the Panzer II and almost as good as the Panzer III, with a radio and better trained crews I think it could have served longer than it did...

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

billy2345 In reply to eltf177 [2019-03-05 16:25:47 +0000 UTC]

Very true, (forgot to mention that, thanks for pointing that out) Just too bad Russian tactics just were not there to make better use of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eltf177 In reply to billy2345 [2019-03-05 17:32:38 +0000 UTC]

The Russians actually had some pretty good designs like the T-26, BT series, The T-100/SMK/KV-series and (of course) the A-20/T-32/T-34. But without radios and with poorly-trained crews (not to mention the purges) they were not going to get the results they wanted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0