aero3-5 [2015-04-28 17:11:02 +0000 UTC]
The Breda 88 was a high speed aircraft until they put guns and bombs on it. I have read that they were used as ground decoys because of their rotten performance!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BlacktailFA In reply to S7alker117 [2015-04-28 08:31:46 +0000 UTC]
Not only that, but it was also the last aircraft developed by Breda that went into production (the only following aircraft I know of was the Ba.201 Dive Bomber, of which only 2 prototypes were built).
As for the F-18 Hornet and F-35 Lightning II, here are a couple of quick facts, mostly to demonstrate that I *am* in fact building profiles on them.
The F-18 had seemed for a while to be a satisfactory aircraft, despite it's flaws --- until I connected the dots. For example, you know how the Hornet is widely-praised for it's multi-engine redundancy? It turns out there isn't any. One engine has an oil pump, and the other has an alternator. Lose the engine with the oil pump, and you have 10 minutes to land before both engines seize --- lose the alternator, and you crash.
The F-35 can't carry Sidewinders internally, because the 'Winder can only be launched from a rail. The bay doors don't have launch rails, nor the ability to accept them, forcing the F-35 to carry Sidewinders externally --- and doing so effectively forfeits radar stealth. With no chance of surviving a hit and little speed or maneuverability, the F-35 relies very heavily on the element of surprise to survive, so carrying Sidewinders is more of a liability than an asset. As such, carrying Sidewinders on F-35s isn't operationally feasible.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
S7alker117 In reply to BlacktailFA [2015-05-05 20:28:59 +0000 UTC]
So... the reason for them to choose the YF-17 over the YF-16 is bogus? Oh my, and I thought the Hornet to be better thna that!
Regarding the F-35... I'm stil trying to find something they're doing right on that one. -.-
👍: 0 ⏩: 0