HOME | DD

blightedangel — Claudia

Published: 2006-04-30 17:36:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 2265; Favourites: 49; Downloads: 28
Redirect to original
Description This is a representation of Claudia from Interview with the Vampire. I tried to make her younger than Kirsten Dunst was in the movie, because in the book she's much younger. However I don't think I succeeded very well. Two roses, light for Lestat, dark for Louis.
Ballpoint (black, as always), November 19, 2003.
Related content
Comments: 13

IAmTheNoNameGirl [2012-11-07 16:29:03 +0000 UTC]

this is really good!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CafiIder [2012-11-06 13:55:55 +0000 UTC]

she looks really cute
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

maggi-power [2011-06-14 23:42:28 +0000 UTC]

Simply cute

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RidiculousRandomHero [2010-04-27 04:44:58 +0000 UTC]

This beautiful picture has been featured here: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

blightedangel In reply to RidiculousRandomHero [2010-04-28 02:47:03 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RidiculousRandomHero In reply to blightedangel [2010-04-28 10:54:00 +0000 UTC]

Your welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

blightedangel In reply to RidiculousRandomHero [2010-04-28 20:11:58 +0000 UTC]

I realise I just committed one of the things I consider most ungrateful and irritating, on dA, the 'thank you' response.
I apologise in depth for the insult! It was a comment meant in the most sincere fashion.
I don't get much publicity on this website, especially for my non-coloured drawings (which I feel are some of the best.) And I think that the ballpoint media is fascinating and deserves a great deal more attention than it recieves.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RidiculousRandomHero In reply to blightedangel [2010-04-28 23:09:50 +0000 UTC]

It is no problem at all.
I agree completely.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

morderwarg [2006-10-17 14:11:52 +0000 UTC]

why light for lestat and dark for louis though? how long into her death is this for if she has a flower for each then obviously it could be no more than 40 or 50 years at the most.

claudia was supposed to be about 5 in this she looks around 7 but considering that in the film kirsten looked about 8-10 its very good

as for claudia herself in this i think its a beautiful picture with a beautiful dress, but she looks too natural until you look at it in large view when you see hands are a little blockish but the fact she is not wearing gloves and yet holding tightly onto the rose -thorns!!!.

FAV

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

blightedangel In reply to morderwarg [2006-10-18 01:12:48 +0000 UTC]

Lestat is light because he's blonde, and in the books you may remember he thought of himself...almost as a god. Louis with his beautiful dark good looks and sombre outlook on himself and the undead life.
I know the proportions are ghastly, and the hands and feet are especially bad. But I am really pleased with the dress, and her hat. Little girls are definately a challenge. This is not a recent work at all, which also explains the badness. ^^
Thanks for your love, I appreciate it so much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JinxArtemis [2006-07-29 19:40:02 +0000 UTC]

Beautifull
Love the shading in the dress and hair ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

museofthenight [2006-04-30 18:40:08 +0000 UTC]

I think she looks fantastic! I loved the book and the movie was pretty good too. very good artwork though!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kazita [2006-04-30 17:37:48 +0000 UTC]

very nice ink job, I like the flowers :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0