Comments: 80
stillnotsorry [2011-07-21 20:32:18 +0000 UTC]
aw, pleaaase make it compatible with the new firefox :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
BoffinBrain In reply to stillnotsorry [2011-08-06 01:55:49 +0000 UTC]
It's not compatible with anything, because it's just a concept.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Chocorroles [2010-12-01 06:33:43 +0000 UTC]
Problem is that people is very retarded when using tags or some people don't use them at all... Sadly dA is not Google so this won't work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kidiu [2009-12-25 08:04:38 +0000 UTC]
What about certain file types? Sometimes, I only want to look at png or gif images.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
miniwatt In reply to Kidiu [2010-05-13 00:29:01 +0000 UTC]
.png as far as I can tell is the best way to save a file...no this it is a lossless compression...jpg is so outdated and yet its 2010 and duh you idiots are still using it. get with the program...there is also .hdr, but only if you want to spend around 20-35 thousand dollars on a true hdr monitor...adobe has them now thats the future...these lcd to led is a joke because the next thing will be hdr images...if you want to be a pro get with the program...do any of you digital artists know about ICC profiles for printing....or are you just going to jump on the band wagon and hope that everything will be digital....you need to know the difference between CMYK and RGB, and yes many new printers are going digital with inks, but remember your history because all this digital stuff is the dumbed down version of the real thing...sorry to be so frank and hurtfull, but as they say the truth hurts doesn't it.....godspeed little seeds.......end of line.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kidiu In reply to miniwatt [2010-05-15 01:49:35 +0000 UTC]
Okay...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BoffinBrain In reply to Kidiu [2009-12-26 18:19:17 +0000 UTC]
I don't see why not, if Google can do it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TekuConcept [2009-10-16 22:57:59 +0000 UTC]
Have you seen Google's custom image search settings?
-> search by selected color
-> search by specified size
-> search by selected type
could they be applied into the advanced search window.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BoffinBrain In reply to TekuConcept [2009-10-17 01:05:25 +0000 UTC]
You'll be interested to hear they'll be adding powerful filtering tools like that in the future!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jakeometer [2008-12-30 17:08:18 +0000 UTC]
fantastic! Dev desperately needs an advanced search. I know how to do advanced searches but it's finicky and i think it had a character limit or didn't completely do my search.
It would also be good if we could search for art off or Deviants based on personal details, like age, sex, subscription etc. Might seem a bit perverse or something though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BoffinBrain In reply to jakeometer [2008-12-30 17:23:00 +0000 UTC]
It would also be extremely useful to search through a particular user's favourites. You can use favby:username, but you can't add anything else to the query.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
platinummyr [2008-10-25 21:01:21 +0000 UTC]
I want a way to search by submission date, so "all deviations that match this search submitted more than x time ago"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BoffinBrain In reply to platinummyr [2008-10-26 16:09:35 +0000 UTC]
That would be nice as well. You can use the Way-back feature on dA but as far as I'm aware it can only browse categories, not search results.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BoffinBrain In reply to platinummyr [2008-10-28 20:00:03 +0000 UTC]
It would be nice if dA kept track of what you've viewed for your own convenience, like YouTube does.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BoffinBrain In reply to platinummyr [2008-10-29 07:40:05 +0000 UTC]
Well, it's definitely on my list of ideas, if I ever get enough influence to make a difference here on dA.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Koshinator [2008-08-20 19:31:51 +0000 UTC]
coolio
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PhilRey [2008-05-14 06:44:27 +0000 UTC]
I dunno, I like the dA search just fine the way it is now...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BoffinBrain In reply to PhilRey [2008-05-15 09:06:21 +0000 UTC]
It wills still function in the same way - this page would be to help users who are unfamiliar with the syntax of the search functions, plus it introduces new features that currently aren't implemented.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhilRey In reply to BoffinBrain [2008-05-17 07:24:18 +0000 UTC]
Uh-huh...*is lost*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BoffinBrain In reply to PhilRey [2008-05-17 07:34:48 +0000 UTC]
I meant exactly what I said! If you know how to use the search features then that's fine, but for those that haven't, they can use the interface.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jQuan [2008-05-10 15:03:10 +0000 UTC]
I'm just waiting for the release
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jQuan [2008-05-10 15:02:50 +0000 UTC]
I'm just waiting for the release
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thegnat In reply to BoffinBrain [2008-05-10 01:36:22 +0000 UTC]
Maybe animation wasn't a good word to describe the emoticons. They seem too detailed. I mean, deviantART has pretty detailed emoticons, but the colours stay simple and detailed enough to well, show details. The just seem too over developed.
I don't know if that's a bad thing or not, but I really enjoy the simplicity of the deviantART emoticons.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BoffinBrain In reply to thegnat [2008-05-10 02:51:29 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I figured. The icons can be found on their own in my gallery - I made them because I was fed up with the old-style pixel ones. It's just a matter of taste.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>