Comments: 86
Boredman In reply to ??? [2013-01-02 22:22:25 +0000 UTC]
True that. Actually he's the one I dislike the least, that's why i picked him for this XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PonderHope In reply to Boredman [2013-01-03 01:44:24 +0000 UTC]
I feel as though Rothko is one of the few "Abstract Expressionists" who has some kind of technique present in their work. Even if that technique is very...vaguely displayed. I feel as though there are SOME principles of design that are present in his work like...well...color and the relationship between two colors. Personally, I'm not a fan of abstract expressionism. I feel as though artists like De Kooning and Pollock have no real technique. I feel as though there are no principles of design present within their work. No values, no contrast, no texture, etc. But this is just my opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MTHMSCUD [2012-02-09 15:16:02 +0000 UTC]
I've always been iffy on modern art myself. I would prefer art that actually had some sense of form rather than just squares or paint splotches on canvases.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Theosky [2012-01-20 19:36:49 +0000 UTC]
o my God i love it!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boredman In reply to Theosky [2012-01-20 20:40:43 +0000 UTC]
Thank you ^^ Glad you did
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MOKOtheCRAZy [2012-01-16 19:28:03 +0000 UTC]
I agree...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ulriksen [2012-01-12 20:01:52 +0000 UTC]
personally, I HATE Modern Art. I could go on a twenty page rant about it, but I won't. just saying that in most caes with modern art, the story behind the piece is good, and interesting, and the piece is shit. in more cases it is both. shit that is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RuuLette [2012-01-12 08:41:58 +0000 UTC]
O .O the lettering was ur own handwriting?....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boredman In reply to RuuLette [2012-01-12 12:25:33 +0000 UTC]
A digitilized version of it, but essentially yes ^^ Thanks !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RuuLette In reply to Boredman [2012-01-12 18:44:43 +0000 UTC]
still, u did what ive wanted to try for a while
XD but was too lazy to ;D it looks nice
and my pleasure ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Verkleidett [2012-01-12 03:18:12 +0000 UTC]
THANK YOU.
I never get the point of abstract work like this, especially when it comes to fine art students who use it as a cover up because they suck at everything else. Or in the popular sense, Lazy-ness.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ValorWhitefield [2012-01-12 00:46:41 +0000 UTC]
epicness in his whole size!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boredman In reply to Vinfuric [2012-01-12 02:38:46 +0000 UTC]
Rothko's painting ? Yea, i guess that one is pretty neat.
Plus most of his work is only interesting if you're standing in front of it, since they're usually human sized.
And thanks ^w^ glad you do
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ThePsychoSloth [2012-01-11 22:48:57 +0000 UTC]
nobody likes that modern art a red dot on white paper crap. No one
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boredman In reply to ThePsychoSloth [2012-01-11 22:53:05 +0000 UTC]
Their business rate might disagree with that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePsychoSloth In reply to Boredman [2012-01-11 22:57:08 +0000 UTC]
I know.. but it just feels better to be immature and look down on people who look at a square with splashes of paint and say its his soul in paint as nothing. or something like that. I'm just sounding stupid as I continue typing aren't I
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boredman In reply to ThePsychoSloth [2012-01-11 23:00:28 +0000 UTC]
Well, now that you mention it... XD nah just kidding, i get your point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePsychoSloth In reply to Boredman [2012-01-11 23:03:08 +0000 UTC]
aw how nice you slightly spared my feelings. shall I ruin the moment and do something more idiotic?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePsychoSloth In reply to Boredman [2012-01-12 02:37:35 +0000 UTC]
FURRY SEX. sorry I'm not used to really good artists actually talking to me usually its one reply or nothing at all
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
devilpengui [2012-01-11 21:50:36 +0000 UTC]
Modern art is disappointing in my opinion.
I prefer classicism.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boredman In reply to devilpengui [2012-01-11 22:13:14 +0000 UTC]
I guess it can be, depends on what it is you expect.
But yea, ditto.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DawnTheCreator [2012-01-11 19:46:36 +0000 UTC]
I remember taking a field trip to an art gallery, and when we got to the Moderen Art section, the first painting (if you could call it that) was a single black dot on a big white canvis, and next to it was a painting that looked like someone through paint on it. And then followed a ton of fruit bowls and flower vase paintings.
A bit of my soul died that day, and I was only 9.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boredman In reply to DawnTheCreator [2012-01-11 20:05:13 +0000 UTC]
To say nothing of the MONEY involved in that sort of paintings. Now that's a real soul-crusher.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DawnTheCreator In reply to Boredman [2012-01-11 20:15:48 +0000 UTC]
T_T
Millions of dollars for a painting a child could do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
smilingStone [2012-01-11 18:44:08 +0000 UTC]
Agree -.-' , autant parfois ça peut être mindblowing autant des fois... Bref.
Dis donc je sais pas à quel point tu l'as travaillé numériquement mais ton écriture est vachement cool! Perso j'adore C:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boredman In reply to smilingStone [2012-01-11 18:48:21 +0000 UTC]
C'est vrai ? OwO Cool. Je vais peut être la modifier encore un peu ici et là, mais si elle plaît déjà comme ça, c'est super.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Boredman In reply to smilingStone [2012-01-11 20:02:39 +0000 UTC]
Ouais, y'en a plein des comme ça. J'ai fais les lettres à la suite, mais après le P j'ai commencé à écrire plus gros, et je m'en suis aperçu qu'à la fin XD Je vais essayer d'arranger ça
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Chickenwithtie [2012-01-11 17:31:46 +0000 UTC]
The last panel made me die, lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FlamiatheDemon [2012-01-11 17:25:04 +0000 UTC]
Ok. As restorer and by almost immediate consequence history of art scholar, not to mention artist and art lover, I do my very best to get into every style and understand the reason behind it, what brought the artist to choose that specific form of expression and the message they want to pass no matter the visual result. Which actually opens your eyes on a lot of things, really.
But still.
IT'S A FUCKING SQUARE ON A CANVAS
So yes we agree, classic art still rocks everyone's tits. ^5
And oooooh purdy font O3O
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>