HOME | DD

borntosparkle β€” scusa

Published: 2008-06-13 16:37:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 4490; Favourites: 48; Downloads: 182
Redirect to original
Description scusa, anche se non basta
Related content
Comments: 16

energiaweb [2012-01-11 09:01:56 +0000 UTC]

bellissimo scatto

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

smithcyberpunk [2008-08-12 23:44:07 +0000 UTC]

mi piace la tonalitΓ  dolce della tua pelle. Credimi non farti mai un tatoo. Nessun inchiostro dovrebbe mai coprirti quelle delicatissime e stupende sfumature che la tua pelle liscia sa produrre.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Krakhan [2008-07-19 05:17:43 +0000 UTC]

You are an angel...
I don't understand the people's comments (?)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hjsybnmhoimhnbu [2008-06-25 18:37:57 +0000 UTC]

anche se non basta cosa?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ROBERT12 [2008-06-16 13:11:25 +0000 UTC]

KISS!!!
Bello sguardo!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nemike [2008-06-13 18:40:12 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful!

Lovely light and pose.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SeverinR [2008-06-13 17:41:39 +0000 UTC]

It is not nudity.
Would you feel the same if she had a backless dress?
Strings make a difference? as in a bikini?

Nothing is shown, it is a very nice beautiful picture.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

borntosparkle In reply to SeverinR [2008-06-13 18:10:27 +0000 UTC]

thank you they speak only to say something

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fractured2 [2008-06-13 17:15:25 +0000 UTC]

perfect mixing of innocense and beauty

very well done, elisa!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lonewolfninja89 [2008-06-13 16:41:57 +0000 UTC]

bello

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Midnight-Inertia [2008-06-13 16:38:30 +0000 UTC]

uh...haven't you ever heard of content filter????

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

borntosparkle In reply to Midnight-Inertia [2008-06-13 16:40:59 +0000 UTC]

I don't think it's necessary

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

gaeti In reply to borntosparkle [2008-06-13 17:04:19 +0000 UTC]

if you don't want to see this deviation banned, you'd better do it
it doesn't get you a thing
anyway …

you're still a beauty

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Midnight-Inertia In reply to borntosparkle [2008-06-13 17:02:22 +0000 UTC]

well...this is nudity...and it requires content filter. I guess you just like flashing innoscent people don't you?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

QuantumElement In reply to Midnight-Inertia [2008-06-13 17:44:25 +0000 UTC]

its IMPLIED nudity.. this could be in the sunday's paper in a department store lingerie ad.. nothing is showing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Midnight-Inertia In reply to QuantumElement [2008-06-13 18:31:41 +0000 UTC]

Well....if you did this in public it would be "Public Indecentcy" what is the difference with a picture?
It's disgusting, and no one wants to be flashed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0