Comments: 16
energiaweb [2012-01-11 09:01:56 +0000 UTC]
bellissimo scatto
π: 0 β©: 0
smithcyberpunk [2008-08-12 23:44:07 +0000 UTC]
mi piace la tonalitΓ dolce della tua pelle. Credimi non farti mai un tatoo. Nessun inchiostro dovrebbe mai coprirti quelle delicatissime e stupende sfumature che la tua pelle liscia sa produrre.
π: 0 β©: 0
Krakhan [2008-07-19 05:17:43 +0000 UTC]
You are an angel...
I don't understand the people's comments (?)
π: 0 β©: 0
hjsybnmhoimhnbu [2008-06-25 18:37:57 +0000 UTC]
anche se non basta cosa?
π: 0 β©: 0
ROBERT12 [2008-06-16 13:11:25 +0000 UTC]
KISS!!!
Bello sguardo!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
nemike [2008-06-13 18:40:12 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful!
Lovely light and pose.
π: 0 β©: 0
SeverinR [2008-06-13 17:41:39 +0000 UTC]
It is not nudity.
Would you feel the same if she had a backless dress?
Strings make a difference? as in a bikini?
Nothing is shown, it is a very nice beautiful picture.
π: 0 β©: 1
Fractured2 [2008-06-13 17:15:25 +0000 UTC]
perfect mixing of innocense and beauty
very well done, elisa!
π: 0 β©: 0
Midnight-Inertia [2008-06-13 16:38:30 +0000 UTC]
uh...haven't you ever heard of content filter????
π: 0 β©: 1
Midnight-Inertia In reply to borntosparkle [2008-06-13 17:02:22 +0000 UTC]
well...this is nudity...and it requires content filter. I guess you just like flashing innoscent people don't you?
π: 0 β©: 1
QuantumElement In reply to Midnight-Inertia [2008-06-13 17:44:25 +0000 UTC]
its IMPLIED nudity.. this could be in the sunday's paper in a department store lingerie ad.. nothing is showing
π: 0 β©: 1
Midnight-Inertia In reply to QuantumElement [2008-06-13 18:31:41 +0000 UTC]
Well....if you did this in public it would be "Public Indecentcy" what is the difference with a picture?
It's disgusting, and no one wants to be flashed.
π: 0 β©: 0