HOME | DD

brentcherry — Freedom of Speech

#buzzwords #censored #censorship #debate #equalrights #liberty #logic #one #onemeaning #oppression #poor #punishment #reason #reasoning #speech #poorreasoning #consequences #disagreement
Published: 2015-04-02 01:13:03 +0000 UTC; Views: 14888; Favourites: 277; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Words have specific meanings. You can't throw around buzzwords and expect to either win an argument or make it seem more valid than it actually is. You also can't stretch their definitions to fit your position.

If you need to do those in order to make your point valid, then the problem isn't the definition. It's your argument.
Related content
Comments: 188

brentcherry In reply to ??? [2024-02-12 08:33:06 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AwesomeNin [2023-09-21 07:59:42 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

MarioFanboysKing [2023-08-22 14:30:23 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to MarioFanboysKing [2023-08-25 08:32:39 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MarioFanboysKing In reply to brentcherry [2023-08-25 08:43:11 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Twilightcat78 [2023-04-17 12:29:48 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Twilightcat78 [2023-04-20 07:23:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

1hope [2021-07-16 01:59:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to 1hope [2021-07-16 04:26:06 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

1hope In reply to brentcherry [2021-07-21 23:54:11 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to 1hope [2021-07-22 00:23:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

1hope In reply to brentcherry [2021-07-22 00:50:41 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to 1hope [2021-07-23 03:57:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

1hope In reply to brentcherry [2021-07-23 16:28:31 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to 1hope [2021-07-24 02:57:10 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

1hope In reply to brentcherry [2021-07-24 22:58:07 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to 1hope [2021-07-25 02:47:39 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

1hope In reply to brentcherry [2021-07-25 15:19:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to 1hope [2021-07-25 21:14:22 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LoudHarveyLefty [2020-12-27 19:56:24 +0000 UTC]

👍: 2 ⏩: 0

ellahoward6 [2020-10-25 22:30:00 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to ellahoward6 [2020-10-26 05:32:34 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aristodes [2020-06-19 19:49:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Aristodes [2020-06-19 21:57:04 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Aristodes In reply to brentcherry [2020-06-19 22:34:26 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Aristodes [2020-06-20 03:28:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Aristodes In reply to brentcherry [2020-06-20 03:45:01 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Aristodes [2020-06-20 09:23:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Aristodes In reply to brentcherry [2020-06-20 14:18:17 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Disneycow82 [2018-08-26 04:05:25 +0000 UTC]

Someone should tell this to cyberbullies that use freedom of speech as an excuse to harass, bully, defame, and shame others in public and defend their acts as "criticism".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Disneycow82 [2018-08-26 04:48:08 +0000 UTC]

I hate bullies of all kind, as I experienced some pretty horrific abuse when I was younger. But as awful as it can be, it's still freedom of speech, so long as it's an opinion or belief that doesn't involve or result in serious real-world damage, threats, or inciting violence.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Disneycow82 In reply to brentcherry [2018-08-26 06:26:07 +0000 UTC]

If it involves defaming, lies, threats, violence, or blackmail, that's another thing, especially if it involves breaking the 9th Commandment: You Shall Not Bear False Witness Against Thy Neighbor. Some words have lost their meaning no thanks to bullies abusing them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Disneycow82 [2018-08-26 07:31:24 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, because those result in serious damages. Lies can be protected by freedom of speech, so long as they don't result in things like defamation of character or fraud.

But yes, people aren't using words are they're meant for, which makes it all the more difficult.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fujin777 [2017-10-08 01:50:23 +0000 UTC]

Seems legit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Fujin777 [2017-10-08 02:19:55 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fujin777 In reply to brentcherry [2017-10-08 20:55:44 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Fujin777 [2017-10-08 22:00:52 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fujin777 In reply to brentcherry [2017-10-08 22:34:39 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Solitary-J [2017-10-05 11:39:15 +0000 UTC]

Another fantastic message of clear truth.  Great job.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Solitary-J [2017-10-05 20:36:29 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Xender1500 [2017-10-04 19:16:34 +0000 UTC]

Nicely put.
I'll just add here that freedom of speech sometimes collide with censorship and other things. Nothing wrong with your deviation, just wanted to put it out in the open since it's not always obvious to people.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Xender1500 [2017-10-04 19:22:37 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Xender1500 In reply to brentcherry [2017-10-14 09:48:35 +0000 UTC]

Sure thing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fahzbehn [2017-10-04 02:17:56 +0000 UTC]

Well said.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to fahzbehn [2017-10-04 04:34:18 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aweandshock [2017-10-03 10:27:00 +0000 UTC]

Amazing work as always.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to aweandshock [2017-10-03 19:33:17 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Brendabrandon [2017-10-03 07:30:15 +0000 UTC]

agreed

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Brendabrandon [2017-10-03 08:17:14 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MAGAt87 [2017-10-03 03:04:54 +0000 UTC]

I'm confused, antifa uses violence in response to free speech. Does that mean free speech is now a crime because someone disagrees and becomes violent?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>