Comments: 23
678091 [2019-07-08 02:48:09 +0000 UTC]
In this case, I feel like the Predecessor was better
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brijeka In reply to 678091 [2019-07-08 03:21:56 +0000 UTC]
Why?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
678091 In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-08 03:27:48 +0000 UTC]
Fire power and ballistics wise, 50 mm is better against light and medium armor and has better He warhead for infantry suppression and demolition roles, plus the frontal slope of the armor makes it hard for HEAT to penetrate
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brijeka In reply to 678091 [2019-07-08 03:37:45 +0000 UTC]
I have not currently designed a predecessor to the Ma 110 APC but it certainly does not carry a 50 mm gun!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
678091 In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-08 03:39:40 +0000 UTC]
The one that you linked the Skyra
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brijeka In reply to 678091 [2019-07-08 03:45:36 +0000 UTC]
The Skral came after the Ma 110.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
678091 In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-08 04:08:25 +0000 UTC]
Oh, sorry, my mistake then, but still the firepower is there, if it had a rocket launcher pod or an ATGM it could be a lot better than Ma 110
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brijeka In reply to 678091 [2019-07-08 05:21:06 +0000 UTC]
Well no duh! That's like saying the M3 Bradley is better than the M113! The Skral is an arguably superior combat vehicle than the Ma 110 in every way, shape and form with the exception that the Ma 110 can carry a few more soldiers and if you read its (the Skral's) description properly, you would know that it can indeed carry four anti tank missiles.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
678091 In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-08 22:22:23 +0000 UTC]
well, cool
I got an idea, try making an upgraded Ma 110 with a 100mm or a 90mm, I'm sure it will look cool and have a lot of firepower
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Brijeka In reply to EmperorMyric [2019-07-06 00:52:47 +0000 UTC]
The original launcher design was similar to that for malyutka missiles the Russians had on their BRDM-2s.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brijeka In reply to EmperorMyric [2019-07-06 06:42:12 +0000 UTC]
You could mount pretty much any launcher on it provided it was within the size and weight limitations.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EmperorMyric In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-06 06:44:48 +0000 UTC]
Should absolutely mount a davy crockett XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EmperorMyric In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-06 15:22:25 +0000 UTC]
Thats fair atomic artillery is always fun, did they go full wacko like the US and USSR with producing nuclear landmines and such too?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brijeka In reply to EmperorMyric [2019-07-07 10:46:44 +0000 UTC]
Tenar has the capability to produce such devices but it is highly unlikely it would use them in the defense of its lands except in an extremely desperate scorched earth policy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EmperorMyric In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-07 19:20:56 +0000 UTC]
Thats a good policy, What form of warfare do they specialise in if any? And do they use any kind of doctrine?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brijeka In reply to EmperorMyric [2019-07-08 03:43:50 +0000 UTC]
Tenar follows its own military doctrine tailored for the defense of its lands and the projection of power across its region but I'm too stupid to currently explore it in great depth (people go to military colleges for that!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1