HOME | DD

Bythmark — Luminescence

Published: 2010-09-05 07:23:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 2453; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 263
Redirect to original
Description Made in Apo7X and GIMP. Lots of GIMP. The problem with high density is too much stuff in the background, but I took care of it

edit: Download to preview if it looks blurry in medium size. You can always close the box
Related content
Comments: 20

wikkid-kid [2011-10-26 21:41:53 +0000 UTC]

Its like water drops falling into a puddle, shot from directly above. I can even hear a single, eerie, high *ploink* sound...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bythmark In reply to wikkid-kid [2011-10-27 00:32:20 +0000 UTC]

That...describes it pretty well actually. Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wikkid-kid In reply to Bythmark [2011-10-27 12:25:30 +0000 UTC]

No problem.. just sayin what it looks like to me...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dementedsnake [2010-09-16 18:23:26 +0000 UTC]

Ooooo, shiny deep blue magic rings. Another pleasant pic perfect to place parallel with a plethora of pretty presentations to placate my plain desktop.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bythmark In reply to Dementedsnake [2010-09-17 19:01:07 +0000 UTC]



thug gotts do what a thug gotta do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dementedsnake In reply to Bythmark [2010-09-17 19:56:55 +0000 UTC]

What a wonderfully random response to my insane rambling.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sed [2010-09-06 20:44:26 +0000 UTC]

FINE work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bythmark In reply to sed [2010-09-06 23:56:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ngh123 [2010-09-06 13:18:47 +0000 UTC]

I think Gimp worsened it abit o.o
Seems overedited, alot of detail is gone.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bythmark In reply to ngh123 [2010-09-06 17:47:44 +0000 UTC]

:/ I can't have it transparent, and putting it on a background shows the details, which were not rendered as much as the remaining features. It looked like a 4500 density render on top of some 500 density renders, and the difference in colors was not pronounced until after the big render.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ngh123 In reply to Bythmark [2010-09-07 00:31:32 +0000 UTC]

Oh well, I guess I cant really say anything since I didnt see the original.^^
But its still quite good, although I like your other ones better. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bythmark In reply to ngh123 [2010-09-07 19:08:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I linked to the original in a reply to allexxx btw

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FunsizeLovesDonuts [2010-09-06 02:18:58 +0000 UTC]

this is epic

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bythmark In reply to FunsizeLovesDonuts [2010-09-06 17:48:02 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FunsizeLovesDonuts In reply to Bythmark [2010-09-06 18:03:40 +0000 UTC]

your welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Allexxx [2010-09-05 07:24:56 +0000 UTC]

Yet another nice one, but it looks kind of blurry, did you scale it up alot so you had to render at high density?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Bythmark In reply to Allexxx [2010-09-05 07:32:15 +0000 UTC]

Here's the messy original, no GIMP, 4500 density.

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Allexxx In reply to Bythmark [2010-09-05 07:37:29 +0000 UTC]

The page isn't loading :/ Ohhh, so that's why it's blurry looking Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Allexxx In reply to Allexxx [2010-09-05 07:38:00 +0000 UTC]

Ahh now it loaded, woah, that was a really different pic

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bythmark In reply to Allexxx [2010-09-05 07:29:15 +0000 UTC]

Nope. I used the softglow filter with some tweaks, as well as some blurred overlays. The stuff in the background was so dense that you couldn't see the good parts . Then I just accentuated it. DL it if you're just looking mid-size, mid-size is rather blurry.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0