HOME | DD

REV6Pilot In reply to roketto-neko [2011-11-19 20:33:52 +0000 UTC]

Does your Gardevoir have detached hands and feet too?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

roketto-neko In reply to REV6Pilot [2011-11-20 10:49:31 +0000 UTC]

Not really.

Since I do not get male gardevoirs that often I was happy to train one and the name Rayman pop in my mind.

Also Rayman is my other favorite game.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

REV6Pilot In reply to roketto-neko [2011-11-21 01:44:13 +0000 UTC]

You do know I was joking, right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

roketto-neko In reply to REV6Pilot [2011-11-23 05:36:38 +0000 UTC]

How I am suppose to know if your "joking".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

REV6Pilot In reply to roketto-neko [2011-11-24 02:12:05 +0000 UTC]

Ahem... Emoticon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

roketto-neko In reply to REV6Pilot [2011-11-24 07:31:53 +0000 UTC]

Well I do not know you.
Besides butting in other people's comments is rude.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShadowScarKnight In reply to REV6Pilot [2011-11-18 05:06:03 +0000 UTC]

Keep in mind though, that the Machoke acting feminine would be a stereotype on its own. Just because it's female, doesn't mean she has to act flower-y. She could be as tough as any other Machoke. Besides, she could be defying stereotypes aside from gender or behavior, like personality.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

REV6Pilot In reply to ShadowScarKnight [2011-11-19 20:39:25 +0000 UTC]

I never said that she had to be girly - I was thinking of something more, let's say "normal", without the amount of coolness in this.

I can't put it in understandable words, actually.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Loaym In reply to Vye-Brante [2011-11-04 04:19:54 +0000 UTC]

I'd say there are certain things in the pokedex entries that it's good to take into account when designing a character's personality. That's the point of making the character a pokemon, after all, and it's interesting when people are able to incorporate the quirks of the species into its personality in a unique way.

I'm not in any way saying that we should be completely restricted by the entries, just that it can be frustrating in some instances if people take defiance of the pokedex too far "just to be different", without adequate explanation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vye-Brante In reply to Loaym [2011-11-07 20:15:04 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I agree. There is a too far, but I'm never one for liking limits anyway. I do things my way because I can. Heh heh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Loaym In reply to Vye-Brante [2011-11-08 04:38:36 +0000 UTC]

I personally like limits - you can work within them in more ways than you'd think, and without them things can become out of whack to the point where it's not even interesting anymore, just ridiculous.

For example, if someone took a pokemon like bidoof, which is stereotyped as dimwitted by its abilities and appearance, and made it determined to overcome the simple nature of its species and become more intelligent and insightful about the world, that's great.

But if your bidoof is randomly able to use human speech or has an IQ of 5000, there'd better be a damn good explanation for it. That's all I'm saying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vye-Brante In reply to Loaym [2011-11-08 07:01:28 +0000 UTC]

Ha ha, very very true. There are still boundaries to be sure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

caat In reply to Aquabat9 [2011-11-03 01:55:35 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

I was worried it was going to look rough shrunk down to that size. Thank goodness for Jasc Animation Shop. 8D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

caat In reply to HeatherTFennec [2011-11-03 01:52:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Wish you all the best with your entry, too! ^-^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

caat In reply to ShadowScarKnight [2011-11-03 01:07:42 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! After a long, hard day of fighting to make progress on OH, hearing a compliment like that is uplifting. C:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

caat In reply to MetalShadowOverlord [2011-11-03 01:08:04 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

caat In reply to wthdude1plz [2011-11-03 01:07:55 +0000 UTC]

Thank you ^-^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0