Comments: 51
cabepfir In reply to ??? [2013-05-24 18:36:56 +0000 UTC]
It was on a blog that doesn't exist anymore. Sorry!
π: 0 β©: 1
RoCkNRoLlGF12 [2009-04-07 21:11:39 +0000 UTC]
i heart thomas more/jeremy northam!
π: 0 β©: 1
cabepfir In reply to RoCkNRoLlGF12 [2009-04-15 09:20:58 +0000 UTC]
Me too! And I still have to watch the second series Γ§_Γ§
π: 0 β©: 1
RoCkNRoLlGF12 In reply to cabepfir [2009-04-19 22:54:50 +0000 UTC]
ur welcome thomas more's the man!
π: 0 β©: 0
bluessaurus [2009-03-30 18:50:06 +0000 UTC]
It's really cool, but I think that for Sir Thomas More, you could use the Hans Holbein's paintings. [link] [link]
π: 0 β©: 1
Anonymiss731 [2009-01-06 23:51:53 +0000 UTC]
The texture is lovely.
The chair design is very unique.
I especially like the composition and the opposition of the characters with color, pose, and expression.
^__^
π: 0 β©: 1
Shu-Maat [2008-12-20 00:39:22 +0000 UTC]
Veramente bello, ottima la scelta della composizione, e mi piace moltissimo come usi gli acquerelli. Complimenti sul serio!
π: 0 β©: 1
droxy [2008-11-25 20:39:59 +0000 UTC]
Interesting interpetation of HP. Lovely composition.
π: 0 β©: 1
cabepfir In reply to droxy [2008-11-30 07:39:28 +0000 UTC]
thank you.
π: 0 β©: 0
Verlisaerys [2008-11-22 14:26:58 +0000 UTC]
Very beautiful colouring!
π: 0 β©: 1
cabepfir In reply to suburbanbeatnik [2008-11-21 07:55:32 +0000 UTC]
OMG. Your review is hilarious indeed. I'll make sure that Silvia reads it, she'll have a laugh too.
I must confess that my readings of historical novels are limited to Ricardian stuff, and a couple of years ago I found in a used books store a novel called, appropriately, "Outrageous" by Christina Dodd. Here is the short summary I did at that time for the RIII Society forum:
It is set in the first years of Henry Tudor's kingdom and it's the story of how Marian, ex-lady companion to Elizabeth of York, and a knight called Griffith try to keep a child, Lionel, away from Tudor's clutches. Lionel is supposed to be Marian's son but in fact he's the son of Elizabeth of York and Richard III (!!!). Richard III had married Elizabeth in a private ceremony just a few days after Anne's death, had raped her and made her pregnant with his child. Then Elizabeth had given birth to Lionel after Bosworth and she had granted custody of him to Marian. Marian and Griffith try to plot against Henry Tudor to put Lionel on the English throne but at the end they reach a compromise with Henry, who'll let the child alive on condition that Lionel will never know that his father was the former king.In the whole book Richard is treated as a cruel, ruthless person capable even to rape the young ans sweet Elizabeth of York and force her into marriage. I've read a lot of things against Richard but I'd never saw him considered a raper of women till now. There will never be an end for the rubbish they can throw on him.
π: 0 β©: 1
suburbanbeatnik In reply to cabepfir [2008-12-01 04:27:35 +0000 UTC]
Well, most romance novels I've seen over the past 15 years have been pro-Ricardian/Yorkist; I think Sharon Kay Penman has been very influential in that regard. Gellis' "Dragon and the Rose" was published in 1977, which was years before "Sunne in Splendour" was published (it was probably before the manuscript was stolen out of Penman's car). This things come in trends, and right now we've been in a pro-Yorkist trend for a while now, which is why I find Dodd's book so curious.
For the record, I'm not a particular fan of Penman's, and I think the Gary Stu portrayals of Richard, esp. in Sandra Worth's novels, are a bit nauseating. I do find the guy interesting though, and I'm glad the days where he was regularly portrayed as a humpbacked villain are long gone. (Have you ever read the Black Arrow by RL Stevenson? A humpbacked Evil!Richard makes a cameo appearance in it, and it's SO over the top... sheesh!)
For the record, my favorite Wars of the Roses story is "The Lancastrian Blush" by Tanith Lee. It's sort of an alchemical historical fantasy novella... I wish it was easier to find, I think I'm one of the few people who've read it!
LOL about the novena by the way.
π: 0 β©: 1
cabepfir In reply to suburbanbeatnik [2008-12-01 09:44:09 +0000 UTC]
What you say about the dates of composition is really interesting, I hadn't thought about it yet.
I admit I have not read all of the Sunne in Splendour, I skipped the childhood chapters, all the parts with Francis Lovell, that I found boring, and other things here and there. What I really, really liked there is the depiction of Elizabeth of York, her continuous love for Richard even when she's married to Henry VII - I believe she's actually my favourite character there. Richard is almost too saintly, you're right, and Anne is weaker than I imagine her.
The Black Arrow, on the other hand, is one of my favourite portraits of Richard ever! I don't mind Stevenson follows the traditional view - he certainly knows how to write, and some phrases he puts in Richard's mouth are admirable even in a revisionist perspective. Especially the last chapter, when he answers to Alicia's remarks, he looks so proud and chivalric. Those are points that appeal me in a particular way. Stevenson's Richard is at the same time a ruthless schemer, a charismatic leader and a desperate loner - and I can lose my head for such a character!
Tanith Lee! I read a book of her when I was a little girl, and liked it a lot. She's not much published in Italy, though, and that's a pity. (Not that the other Ricardian stuff is - I've bought it all in England or on amazon).
π: 0 β©: 1
suburbanbeatnik In reply to cabepfir [2008-12-06 09:51:33 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I was pretty bored with Sunne... I only got a few chapters into it before giving it up. (I would love to hear about that guy who stole the manuscript... how weird! Who steals manuscripts?) I'm sorry to say I was pretty bored by "Arrow" too; I've tried to read several books by Stevenson and he doesn't do anything for me.
You should try to read more Tanith Lee, she's soooo good!
So, for your reading pleasure, here's one of her best novels ever, "The Silver Metal Lover." You can read it here: [link]
π: 0 β©: 0
jekaa [2008-11-20 06:38:00 +0000 UTC]
Lovely work, even before the full veiw I recognized Thomas More ^^
And yea, I like the marble walls too!
π: 0 β©: 1
Dr-Mabuse [2008-11-20 01:17:37 +0000 UTC]
I like it. Very theatrical.
I like the way you drew Servatius Rogerus. I will have to learn more about him.
π: 0 β©: 1
cabepfir In reply to Dr-Mabuse [2008-11-20 11:34:21 +0000 UTC]
Unfortunately there's not much about him, on his own. But you can read Erasmus' letters to him, they're very romantic.
π: 0 β©: 0
Veronika-Art [2008-11-19 12:49:54 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
cabepfir In reply to Bodach [2008-11-19 18:49:10 +0000 UTC]
Unfortunately here in Italy I could see on tv only the first season of The Tudors, for the moment. Season 2 was broadcasted on a pay per view channel that I don't have.
Moreover, I saw The Tudors dubbed in Italian, so I didn't know at all the details about the way the Spanish characters talk in the original version. It's interesting to learn that in Elizabeth they were given an hispanoamerican accent, even if I can understand your detachment from it. It's quite annoying to hear in the movies italo-americans always speaking with a Sicilian accent.
π: 0 β©: 1
Bodach In reply to cabepfir [2008-11-20 17:06:40 +0000 UTC]
Well, spaniards with argentinian accents in Elisabeth's England was more surrealistic than annoying hehehe. But the partiality, worst than 50's films, finally exceed my tolerance, old ones were funny at least.
Tudors was interesting, I saw it on PC and I liked it. Henry, François and Carlos are well characterized and their plots and acts for dominate Europe and be the greatest one seems as stupid as in the history books. Still I can't deal with Thomas More hehehe.
Hope one day I would watch similar series about Ireland or Scotland history... Real Macbeth, Jacobite uprisings or 1798 would be amazing!
π: 0 β©: 1
cabepfir In reply to Bodach [2008-11-23 09:13:24 +0000 UTC]
The Tudors was interesting to watch, even if history was a bit romanticized by the writers.
I'd like to see a series about Italian history - it's so full of intrigues, wars, different royal houses. Not only about the Borgias (who seems to catalize much attention in fiction, even if I'm not much interested in them), but about older periods, the Middle Ages for example, or the XVII century.
π: 0 β©: 1
Bodach In reply to cabepfir [2008-11-25 12:21:16 +0000 UTC]
Ups! He hecho caso omiso por completo esta parte de la serie y tambiΓ©n la historia ^ ^ U, pero siempre he odiado este tipo de manipulaciones que no son necesarias.
SΓ, hay unas pocas pelΓculas histΓ³ricas sobre EspaΓ±a. Algunos acerca de ColΓ³n, las guerras en Flandes como Alastriste, muchos tribunal parcelas y ahora hay una pelΓcula sobre "El Greco" en los cines. Sin embargo, todavΓa no parece suficiente para mΓ = P
Y pelΓculas sobre Italia son por lo general mejor.
π: 0 β©: 1
cabepfir In reply to Bodach [2008-11-25 18:50:23 +0000 UTC]
Ah, yes! I saw Viggo Mortensen's Alatriste too, last year, and around 1992 they made a couple of movies about the discovery of America. And Milos Forman directed Goya's Ghost (which in Italian is named "L'ultimo inquisitore") but I haven't watched it yet.
I liked Alatriste, though I've never read the books and I don't know if it's a faithful version or not.
π: 0 β©: 1
InTheArmsOfUndertow [2008-11-19 10:09:20 +0000 UTC]
This is beautiful!! Maybe it's because the watercolour technique makes it more outstanding, but I love the marble effect of the walls!
π: 0 β©: 1
cabepfir In reply to InTheArmsOfUndertow [2008-11-19 18:43:00 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I used a very thin paper, because I had to print the line art on it, so I could use only a few layers of colour.
π: 0 β©: 0
FatherStone [2008-11-19 08:36:42 +0000 UTC]
Ottime scelte cromatiche e molto belle le pose dei personaggi!
π: 0 β©: 1
cabepfir In reply to FatherStone [2008-11-19 18:42:04 +0000 UTC]
Grazie! Ti piacciono davvero? Li ho disegnati separatamente e poi riuniti col photoshop, quindi le proporzioni le ho aggiustate digitalmente invece che con le mie solite matite.
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>