alfbie [2006-09-05 20:41:27 +0000 UTC]
Damn those lakes! They get all the attention! *fist shakey, lol* Lake Tahoe, or some other lake? Been a while since I've seen the Sierra's *sigh* Question: if you don't digitally alter a photograph at all, wouldn't it be categorized under photographs (or photography or whatever) instead of under traditional art? Don't know DA that well, so I could be totally wrong
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cabochonwolf In reply to alfbie [2006-09-06 04:17:45 +0000 UTC]
No, it's not Lake Tahoe. I forget what the lake was called. Yes, it's been a while since you last seen the Sierras I believe that if I don't digitally alter a photograph at all it can be categorized as either Traditional Art or a Photograph. Photographs can have minimal amount of manipulation added to them (just to touch them up a bit) while Traditional Art cannot. At least that's what I gathered from the descriptions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0