Comments: 15
Derbella [2016-10-03 21:32:42 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vannjaren [2016-10-03 20:55:17 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful work with your inking, I love the definition and shading, and your use of varied angles! ^^
Also nice to see a variety between the different legs, as they look like they've been drawn from different dogs. ^^
The only thing I would say is that in the top skeletal study, your metatarsals seem a tad short and the degree of curvature really looks a bit excessive (normally these bones look pretty straight: digicoll.library.wisc.edu/Scie… markasmithoca.files.wordpress.… www.exploringnature.org/graphi…), but I suppose it's not beyond variation in dogs that this is still within limits. The way the calcaneum and outer metatarsal bow backwards looks almost a tiny bit human here with the shape of the arch. Maybe just something to watch though if you're thinking of drawing skeleton doggies any time soon... But anyway, I guess it depends if you reffed off a dog or a breed with more atypical leg proportions/anatomy, in which case that would explain this. ^^
(I hope you don't mind this tiny bit of critique, the rest looks amazing, and of course I could never draw anything like this! )
Overall very amazing work, I envy your anatomy and ink skills! :'D
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Canis-Infernalis In reply to Vannjaren [2016-10-03 21:40:15 +0000 UTC]
hm you are right! i don´t remember the pictures i was referencing it from but i do remember they had more arch than I thought was normal. i will take that into account next time, thanks a lot!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Canis-Infernalis In reply to Vannjaren [2016-10-03 22:17:29 +0000 UTC]
i dont seem to be able to find whatever i was using as reference so i´m very confused rn. was it all a fever dream. are my sketches real at all
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vannjaren In reply to Canis-Infernalis [2016-10-03 22:31:30 +0000 UTC]
Ah, Google images likes to play tricks with us - we look at a picture, then try to find it again and can't.
I think this was it though as it looks veeeery similar - and actually it's not even a hindleg, it's a front leg! :'D I was wondering when I looked at yours what was going on with the tarsal bones and why that region appeared to be so short (normally it goes further down and appear to form a little square/rectangular block), but this explains it then! (also, haha, your sketches are of course real - and REALLY awesome! Not your fault at all here if the diagram itself was off and incorrect, but diagrams sometimes are! Part of why real life is often sooo much better and more reliable, as people making diagrams don't always portray things quite right)
This is the ref I think you used for the hindleg as it looks virtually identical (even though it's actually a front leg, but it's drawn kinda funny in the diagram so it looks a tiny bit like a hindleg):
www.merckvetmanual.com/media/p…
TBH, it's not even a great ref for a front leg, this is much better and more accurate (whoever made that diagram I think needs to go back and edit it!): hippie.nu/~unicorn/tut/img/bas…
s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/o…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Canis-Infernalis In reply to Vannjaren [2016-10-03 22:37:31 +0000 UTC]
oh MM i know for sure it wasn´t that picture but UH i still cant friggin find what the heck did i use. it might have been a front leg tho because when I started drawing the legs I wasn´t going for only hind ones...........mmmmmmmmmmmmm
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Svenrin [2016-10-03 20:10:10 +0000 UTC]
so simple
yet so perfect
like that anatomy
is spot on ahh
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HunterBeingHunted [2016-10-03 19:28:32 +0000 UTC]
This looks so neat and accurate, my studies are always squiggly ass lines or hairy sketches that are barely worth showing to anyone XD.. when ever I do make a study of something.. last time was billion years ago...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1