HOME | DD

cardinal — The Gap of Dunloe

Published: 2007-10-16 21:38:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 1262; Favourites: 39; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Taken in the Gap of Dunloe, Killarney.

Update 7/7/08:
I've added a detailed description of how I produced this for the *Ex-po-zure Advanced Photography 101 class.


Location
This was taken outdoors (in case you couldn’t tell ) in sunny weather with a few clouds in the sky. It was about 8pm in July, so the sun was low in the sky behind me.

Equipment & Technique
I used a Canon 300D with the 17-85mm IS USM lens. The exposure was 1/70 of a second at f/5.9, ISO 100. I didn’t have my tripod with me, otherwise I would have used a smaller aperture to increase the sharpness throughout the scene. I also didn’t have an ND grad filter back then, so in the raw image the mountain and sky were much brighter than the foreground, however shooting in raw allowed me to correct this later on.

Post Processing
To do this, I first opened up the raw image in Photoshop CS3, choosing the best settings in Camera Raw for just the sky and mountain top. I then opened another copy of the raw image, this time increasing the exposure value so that the ground was the correct brightness. This will increase the amount of noise in a picture, but shooting at ISO 100 gave me more flexibility before the image became too noisy. Next, I added a layer mask to the foreground layer and used the gradient tool to mask off the top of the image so that the original sky was exposed. I added curves adjustment layers to each copy of the picture to fine tune the brightness of each, then another curves layer to increase the overall contrast. Finally, I copied the finished picture onto a new layer and sharpened with the smart sharpen tool.

I hope this has been helpful, feel free to ask if there’s anything more you’d like to know!
Related content
Comments: 14

Taren14 [2008-12-19 00:08:37 +0000 UTC]

I'VE BEEN THERE! It was so pwetty...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cardinal In reply to Taren14 [2008-12-21 16:30:12 +0000 UTC]

Yup, it's a really beautiful part of the world!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

the-shining [2008-07-11 21:50:03 +0000 UTC]

Nice scene
It is also nice to know how you post-process the image

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cardinal In reply to the-shining [2008-07-12 21:38:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I'm glad you found it interesting!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rhunel [2008-07-11 02:54:27 +0000 UTC]

Geez, I feel like such a cavewoman now. All I have is a Fujifilm Finepix A400 and Corel Photohouse (very few bells and whistles as a photo editor). You are raising the bar so much I may as well give up because I cannot afford the equipment to take and modify a photgraph as well as that. Your photo is like being there, almost.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cardinal In reply to rhunel [2008-07-12 22:13:24 +0000 UTC]

Heheh, thanks! You're very kind! You shouldn't be put off just because you don't have the best equipment though, it's what you do with it that counts Have a look at [link] for an example of what compact cameras can do

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rhunel In reply to cardinal [2008-07-13 04:10:41 +0000 UTC]

I appreciate the encouragement. I was looking at the photographer's comment--
"thank you - aehm no! i did not use a pol filter ... i have a uv filter on it. but this effect is done via a 2nd layer - channel mixer - red monocrom - 2nd layer, mask and gradient fill. probably i should publish a tut for this ?"

--and it appears that it's been edited substantially, at least by the standards I'm used to. I really should pick up a photography magazize and see what I can do, since every legitimate photographer is now editing their pictures. In my past experience (I'm not a professional), it was something seen as bad or dishonest, akin to cheating, to edit one's pictures more than the bare minimum. I guess I'm going to have to accept and adapt to the fact that things are different in the real photographer world and do the best I can given what I can afford... if I don't, I'll never be able to compete for sale with those who do it.

Thank you again, all the best in your photography!

Debra

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cardinal In reply to rhunel [2008-07-13 11:57:33 +0000 UTC]

I wouldn't say it has been edited that much. For me, normal editing is increasing the contrast and saturation. I don't consider this cheating, as it's the same as using a film which produces these qualities such as Fuji Velvia . I get the effect on the computer rather than in the camera, but the result is the same.

What I would consider extensive editing is when you start changing the colours, removing objects or swapping the sky for a different one. None of these are bad though, it just becomes photomanipulation rather than plain photography.

Photo magazines are good for tutorials, but there's loads of stuff online as well. Take a look at [link] for starters.

Have fun experimenting!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rhunel In reply to cardinal [2008-07-14 02:04:39 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! I appreciate your helpfulness!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HeatherWaller-Rivet [2008-01-14 23:40:25 +0000 UTC]

you are featured in my journal[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cardinal In reply to HeatherWaller-Rivet [2008-01-20 11:10:46 +0000 UTC]

That's really kind! Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HeatherWaller-Rivet In reply to cardinal [2008-01-21 15:25:19 +0000 UTC]

most welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kkart [2008-01-13 09:24:31 +0000 UTC]

A totally and completely perfect shot! I will feature this in an upcoming journal, shocked it doesn't have over 200 favs....amazing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alfakroell [2007-10-20 17:40:28 +0000 UTC]

So beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0