Comments: 29
acheronnights [2016-08-16 04:53:08 +0000 UTC]
Hey there! I used this piece as inspiration for mine in ManipulateThis 's "Similar But Different" game! Thank you so much! I love your original!
fav.me/dae7ek4
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
supersnappz16 [2016-07-26 09:53:49 +0000 UTC]
Magical scene.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ritaflowers [2011-03-20 02:20:00 +0000 UTC]
great composition my friend!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MaureenOlder [2011-02-18 15:31:13 +0000 UTC]
Im a surreal fan and here is a fun image
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
brandrificus [2011-02-15 19:13:11 +0000 UTC]
this is very interesting work my friend. Nice Job !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
digimagicnb [2011-02-15 04:32:17 +0000 UTC]
Very interesting; also pretty, which not all surreality is....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mysticmorning [2011-02-15 00:21:01 +0000 UTC]
You put a lot of time and work in this, and it paid off, its great!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
da-joint-stock In reply to cazcastalla [2011-02-15 12:44:29 +0000 UTC]
That's the difficulty with surrealism. I had this conversation with =thefantasim during one of the Challenges because we both had different opinion of what surreal meant (compared to 'Abstract').
I think of it this way: 'realism' is depicting something as realisticly and/or naturally as possible, even if that object is a machine, there are still certain 'natural' things about it, light lighting, shadows and gravity. 'Surreal' art, or 'sur-reality' is like an alternate reality. This 'other-reality' can be as distorted or imaginative as you like, but it still has rules - although, you are now able to bend those rules. You can choose to make the lighting different on each object, or choose to make objects float, but if you do - you must follow through with those rules.
I basically look at Salvidore Dali's work as a base. Dali created some of teh most surreal artworks to date, but his work was always in full-detail. If it was not detailed then it would be considered abstract. Hehe anyways my point, is I belive Dali would have paid great attention to those leaves...
Then again....that's just my opinion
👍: 0 ⏩: 1